On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 13:40, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:18:52PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 18:40, btinsley wrote:
>> > AIS guys said to upgrade to the latest Whitetank :-)? I did and the
>> > behavior
>> > is the same, but it's not
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:18:52PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 18:40, btinsley wrote:
> > AIS guys said to upgrade to the latest Whitetank :-)? I did and the behavior
> > is the same, but it's not necessarily incorrect. The aisexec process sets
> > itself to the real
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 18:40, btinsley wrote:
> AIS guys said to upgrade to the latest Whitetank :-) I did and the behavior
> is the same, but it's not necessarily incorrect. The aisexec process sets
> itself to the realtime scheduling class, which does the same for all of the
> Pacemaker process
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:49 AM, btinsley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:13 AM, btinsley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:39, Dejan Muhamedagic
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:07:27AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:13 AM, btinsley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:39, Dejan Muhamedagic
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:07:27AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> Nothing in pacemaker - but the lrmd could be doing so
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:39, Dejan Muhamedagic
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:07:27AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> Nothing in pacemaker - but the lrmd could be doing something that may
> >> be involved
> >
> > AFAIK, it doesn
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 11:39, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:07:27AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Nothing in pacemaker - but the lrmd could be doing something that may
>> be involved
>
> AFAIK, it doesn't.
Ok, I was just thinking that its the one that ultimately spawns t
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:21:44PM -0500, btinsley wrote:
> This is a little early in investigation on my end, but is there anything
> that Pacemaker... or potentially OpenAIS, does that would restrict a cluster
> resource from setting the scheduler type and/or priority? I have been
> tinkerin
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:07:27AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Nothing in pacemaker - but the lrmd could be doing something that may
> be involved
AFAIK, it doesn't.
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 02:21, btinsley wrote:
> > This is a little early in investigation on my end, but is there anything
Nothing in pacemaker - but the lrmd could be doing something that may
be involved
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 02:21, btinsley wrote:
> This is a little early in investigation on my end, but is there anything
> that Pacemaker... or potentially OpenAIS, does that would restrict a cluster
> resource from
This is a little early in investigation on my end, but is there anything
that Pacemaker... or potentially OpenAIS, does that would restrict a cluster
resource from setting the scheduler type and/or priority? I have been
tinkering with KVM instances and there is a 100% repeatable difference
between
11 matches
Mail list logo
