- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:27:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration
>
> - Original Message -
> > Fr
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Beekhof"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 3:42:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration
>
>
> On 15 Jan 2014, at 7:12 pm, Kazunori INO
On 15 Jan 2014, at 7:12 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> With new migration logic, when VM was migrated by 'node standby',
> start was performed in migrate_target. (migrate_from was not performed.)
>
> Is this the designed behavior?
>
>
> # crm_mon -rf1
> Stack: corosync
> Current D
Hi David,
2013/11/6 David Vossel :
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Kazunori INOUE"
>> To: "pm"
>> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 4:43:53 AM
>> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration logic
>>
>> Hi David,
>&
- Original Message -
> From: "Kazunori INOUE"
> To: "pm"
> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 4:43:53 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration logic
>
> Hi David,
>
> Because I have a plan to test the function of migration in
>
Hi David,
Because I have a plan to test the function of migration in
pacemaker-1.1, I am interested in this commit.
https://github.com/davidvossel/pacemaker/commit/673e8599e4
If this "new migration logic" is merged into ClusterLabs,
when do you think it will be merged?
Best Regards,
Kazunori INO
