On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Fausto Lombardi wrote:
> Oh. but if I want that the resources in a group start without
> order and if one crashs the others still remain active?
"don't use a group then"
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@oss.clus
Oh. but if I want that the resources in a group start without
order and if one crashs the others still remain active?
2009/10/13 Johan Verrept :
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 17:49 +0200, Fausto Lombardi wrote:
>> Hi of all,
>> can I do a group where the resources in it start in sequence and if
>>
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 17:49 +0200, Fausto Lombardi wrote:
> Hi of all,
> can I do a group where the resources in it start in sequence and if
> one of this resource fails, fail also the other in sequence?
This is how a "group" behaves.
See manual under "group"
J.
Hi of all,
can I do a group where the resources in it start in sequence and if
one of this resource fails, fail also the other in sequence?
I would tho do this to avoid the creation of a lot of constraints.
Thanks.
___
Pacemaker mailing list
Pacemaker@