On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:24:52 +0200 Oriol Mula-Valls
wrote:
> There is a bug already open:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697357
Thanks for the link.
I did a combination of the things written there:
- I slightly changed my network-setup. Now its one active-passive bond
to
Hi,
There is a bug already open:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697357
Kind regards,
Oriol
On 29/07/13 21:41, Jelle de Jong wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/07/13 20:58, Arnold Krille wrote:
So further testing show that the bonded interfaces below
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/07/13 20:58, Arnold Krille wrote:
> So further testing show that the bonded interfaces below seem to
> eat all broadcasts and all forwards (for the virtual machines).
> Don't know why yet. But as soon as I switched my network-config to
> use the
Am 2013-07-29 18:46, schrieb Arnold Krille:
Hi all,
I have a little problem here and would like to get some help:
I have (had?) a working three-node cluster of two active nodes
(nebel1 and nebel2) and one standby-node (nebel3) running debian
squeeze + backports. That is pacemaker 1.1.7-1~bpo60+
Hi all,
I have a little problem here and would like to get some help:
I have (had?) a working three-node cluster of two active nodes (nebel1
and nebel2) and one standby-node (nebel3) running debian squeeze +
backports. That is pacemaker 1.1.7-1~bpo60+1 and corosync
1.4.2-1~bpo60+1.
Now I up
