On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 12.02.2013 14:11, Viacheslav Biriukov wrote:
>> Why don't you use it? Do you know any issues with this method?
>
> I just did not need it yet.
>
> And, one also needs to check that it is possible to cleanly delete nodes
> from a CIB (bo
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 12.02.2013 14:11, Viacheslav Biriukov wrote:
>> Why don't you use it? Do you know any issues with this method?
>
> I just did not need it yet.
>
> And, one also needs to check that it is possible to cleanly delete nodes
Since the hostna
12.02.2013 14:11, Viacheslav Biriukov wrote:
> Why don't you use it? Do you know any issues with this method?
I just did not need it yet.
And, one also needs to check that it is possible to cleanly delete nodes
from a CIB (both configuration and status sections) and they do not
reappear there any
Why don't you use it? Do you know any issues with this method?
Thank you.
2013/2/12 Vladislav Bogdanov
> 12.02.2013 13:05, Viacheslav Biriukov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Maybe this help
> > you http://lists.corosync.org/pipermail/discuss/2011-October/000101.html
>
> That is perfectly described (at
12.02.2013 13:05, Viacheslav Biriukov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe this help
> you http://lists.corosync.org/pipermail/discuss/2011-October/000101.html
That is perfectly described (at least as of 2.3.0) in section "DYNAMIC
ADD/REMOVE OF UDPU NODE" of cmap_keys(8). Although I did not use it yet.
Vladi
Hi,
Maybe this help you
http://lists.corosync.org/pipermail/discuss/2011-October/000101.html
2013/2/12 Florian Crouzat
> Le 12/02/2013 10:39, Lars Marowsky-Bree a écrit :
>
> On 2013-02-12T10:24:29, Florian Crouzat
>> wrote:
>>
>> There might be other ways, probably cleaner, but you can a
Le 12/02/2013 10:39, Lars Marowsky-Bree a écrit :
On 2013-02-12T10:24:29, Florian Crouzat wrote:
There might be other ways, probably cleaner, but you can always:
"always" is relative. This doesn't work for services like
GFS2/OCFS2/cLVM2.
Regards,
Lars
Yeah right, I don't use shared
On 2013-02-12T10:24:29, Florian Crouzat wrote:
> There might be other ways, probably cleaner, but you can always:
"always" is relative. This doesn't work for services like
GFS2/OCFS2/cLVM2.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Feli
Le 12/02/2013 10:10, Michal Fiala a écrit :
Hello,
is there a way how to online add a new node to corosync/pacemaker
cluster, where nodes communicate by unicast UDP?
Thanks
Michal
There might be other ways, probably cleaner, but you can always:
* put the cluster into maintenance-mode
* shut
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Michal Fiala wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a way how to online add a new node to corosync/pacemaker
> cluster, where nodes communicate by unicast UDP?
I don't think this is possible as you need to update corosync.conf on
all nodes with the new node to be adde
Hello,
is there a way how to online add a new node to corosync/pacemaker
cluster, where nodes communicate by unicast UDP?
Thanks
Michal
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Pr
11 matches
Mail list logo