Re: [Pacemaker] Multicast corosync packets and default route

2014-11-07 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Daniel Dehennin writes: > Hello, > [...] > I only manage to have my VM as corosync member like others when default > the route is on the same interface as my multicast traffic. Here are some corosync informations: On one working host: root@nebula3:~# corosync-quorumtool Quorum inform

[Pacemaker] Multicast corosync packets and default route

2014-11-06 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Hello, I'm trying to setup a pacemaker/corosync on Ubuntu Trusty to access a SAN to use with OpenNebula[1]: - pacemaker .1.10+git20130802-1ubuntu2.1 - corosync 2.3.3-1ubuntu1 I have a dedicated VLAN for cluster communications. Each bare metal node have a dedicated interface eth0 on that VLAN, 3