Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2012-03-20T11:42:08, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> > I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when >> > transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the resource >> > migration. >> > >> > That is:

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-20 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-03-20T11:42:08, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when > > transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the resource > > migration. > > > > That is: > > 1. nodea: migrate_to nodeb > > 2. transition abort > > 3. nodeb

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi, > > I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when > transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the resource > migration. > > That is: > 1. nodea: migrate_to nodeb > 2. transition abort > 3. n

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-16 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
16.03.2012 05:46, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote: >>> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi, I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when tran

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-15 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote: >> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when >>> transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middl

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-15 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2012-03-14T23:49:26, Andreas Kurz wrote: > >> > Is the current behavior intended? >> You mean that a migration is rolled-back due to a transition abort -- >> depending on its progress? I think that is the defined (and intended) >> be

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-15 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote: > On 03/15/2012 05:22 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote: >>> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi, I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when tr

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-15 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
15.03.2012 10:55, Andreas Kurz wrote: > On 03/15/2012 05:22 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote: >>> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi, I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when transition is abor

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-15 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 03/15/2012 05:22 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote: >> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when >>> transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the r

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-14 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote: > On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when >> transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the resource >> migration. >> >> That is: >> 1. nodea: migrate

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-14 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-03-14T23:49:26, Andreas Kurz wrote: > > Is the current behavior intended? > You mean that a migration is rolled-back due to a transition abort -- > depending on its progress? I think that is the defined (and intended) > behavior since quite a long time ... maybe Andrew likes to comment on

Re: [Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-14 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi, > > I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when > transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the resource > migration. > > That is: > 1. nodea: migrate_to nodeb > 2. transition abort > 3. nodeb: st

[Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

2012-03-14 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi, I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the resource migration. That is: 1. nodea: migrate_to nodeb 2. transition abort 3. nodeb: stop 4. nodea: migrate_to nodec 5. nodec: migrate_from nodea (note: no s