Re: [Pacemaker] Master-Slave role stickiness

2015-03-29 Thread Andrew Beekhof
> On 23 Jan 2015, at 9:13 am, brook davis wrote: > > < snip > >> It sounds like default-resource-stickiness does not kick in; and with >> default resource-stickiness=1 it is expected (10 > 6). Documentation >> says default-recource-stickiness is deprecated so may be it is ignored >> in your ver

Re: [Pacemaker] Master-Slave role stickiness

2015-01-22 Thread brook davis
< snip > It sounds like default-resource-stickiness does not kick in; and with default resource-stickiness=1 it is expected (10 > 6). Documentation says default-recource-stickiness is deprecated so may be it is ignored in your version altogether? What "ptest -L -s" shows? I see now that defaul

Re: [Pacemaker] Master-Slave role stickiness

2015-01-22 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:06 PM, brook davis wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a master-slave resource and I'd like to achieve the following > behavior with it: > > * Only ever run (as master or slave) on 2 specific nodes (out of N possible > nodes). These nodes are predetermined and are specified at re

[Pacemaker] Master-Slave role stickiness

2015-01-21 Thread brook davis
Hi, I've got a master-slave resource and I'd like to achieve the following behavior with it: * Only ever run (as master or slave) on 2 specific nodes (out of N possible nodes). These nodes are predetermined and are specified at resource creation time. * Prefer one specific node (of the 2 se