Hi,
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 02:56:18PM +0200, Christian Ciach wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am dealing with a three-node multi-site cluster using pacemaker and
> corosync. The third node is a quorum-only node.
>
> The three nodes form a single cluster and are connected using corosync over
> the internet
Hello,
I am dealing with a three-node multi-site cluster using pacemaker and
corosync. The third node is a quorum-only node.
The three nodes form a single cluster and are connected using corosync over
the internet (using VPN tunnels). Of cource, using corosync over the
internet and using a third
Andrew Beekhof writes:
> use a score less than zero.
thanks - i created a small WA which perfectly fits my need.
I just created a second Resource Order to stop the "client resource" on the
failover node before the "master resource" comes up on it.
Due to a second Resource Order the "client" reso
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Rainer wrote:
> Hello all,
> i have a two node cluster. On both nodes i have a group running. I know who to
> set the colocations that both groups never run on the same node, but in a
> failover case, i have both groups on the same node.
> Is it possilbe to stop a
Hello all,
i have a two node cluster. On both nodes i have a group running. I know who to
set the colocations that both groups never run on the same node, but in a
failover case, i have both groups on the same node.
Is it possilbe to stop a group in that case with a constraint?
Kind regards,
Rain
