Re: [Pacemaker] KVM VM's on internal DRBD volumes

2011-06-21 Thread Pawel Warowny
Dnia Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:22:14 +0200 Pieter Baele napisał(a): Hi > Hi, below part of the configuration + tidy (a lot is configured using > DRBD MC) From my very limited experience: Kvm guests controlled by ocf:heartbeat:VirtualDomain are very fussy. Sometimes they do not want to start or stop

Re: [Pacemaker] KVM VM's on internal DRBD volumes

2011-06-21 Thread Pieter Baele
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:42, Pawel Warowny wrote: > Dnia Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:58:03 +0200 > Pieter Baele napisał(a): > > Hi > >> Maybe I've to tweak some parameters/ordering/colocation/ ? Or do I >> really need shared storage? Or > > Maybe, but we have no idea if you don't show us your c

Re: [Pacemaker] KVM VM's on internal DRBD volumes

2011-06-18 Thread Devin Reade
One of my clusters (fairly old; heartbeat 3.0.0 on openais) runs VMs on Xen, with storage being directly on the drbd device. I noticed a similar problem where manual failovers were fine but cluster-initiated failovers failed. It turned out that setting a start delay on the xen RA solved the probl

Re: [Pacemaker] KVM VM's on internal DRBD volumes

2011-06-18 Thread Pawel Warowny
Dnia Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:58:03 +0200 Pieter Baele napisał(a): Hi > Maybe I've to tweak some parameters/ordering/colocation/ ? Or do I > really need shared storage? Or Maybe, but we have no idea if you don't show us your configuration :) Best regards -- Pawel Warowny signature.asc De

Re: [Pacemaker] KVM VM's on internal DRBD volumes

2011-06-17 Thread Pieter Baele
The idea is a setup described as described by Florian Haas in "Virtual Consolidated High Availability", (www.netways.de/uploads/media/Florian_Haas_drbd.pdf) but there are soms details I need to configure better. I've done the setup before with OpenVZ, but that's different :-)

[Pacemaker] KVM VM's on internal DRBD volumes

2011-06-17 Thread Pieter Baele
It's a while since I've done some pacemaker testing, but yesterday I've done a setup of KVM guests on top off DRBD volumes This without using shared storage or cluster file systems. (2-node cluster) I like this setup because it allows applications that can't be clustered easily to run in an VM. Li