On 11 November 2010 16:59, Dan Frincu wrote:
[...snip...]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Example 6.1. Example set of opt-in location constraints
>
> At the moment you have symmetric-cluster=false, you need to add
> location constraints in order to get your resources running.
> Below is
Hi,
Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 11 November 2010 13:04, Dan Frincu wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Dan Frincu wrote:
Hi all,
I've managed to make this setup work, basically the issue with a
symmetric-cluster="false" and specifying the resources' locatio
On 11 November 2010 13:04, Dan Frincu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Dan Frincu wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've managed to make this setup work, basically the issue with a
> symmetric-cluster="false" and specifying the resources' location manually
> mean
Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Dan Frincu wrote:
Hi all,
I've managed to make this setup work, basically the issue with a
symmetric-cluster="false" and specifying the resources' location manually
means that the resources will always obey the location constraint,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Dan Frincu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've managed to make this setup work, basically the issue with a
> symmetric-cluster="false" and specifying the resources' location manually
> means that the resources will always obey the location constraint, and (as
> far as I coul
Hi all,
I've managed to make this setup work, basically the issue with a
symmetric-cluster="false" and specifying the resources' location
manually means that the resources will always obey the location
constraint, and (as far as I could see) disregard the rsc_defaults
resource-stickiness valu
