Re: [Pacemaker] Improvement for the communication failure of booth

2013-03-25 Thread yusuke iida
Hi, Jiaju A reply becomes slow, and I'm sorry. 2013/2/12 Jiaju Zhang : > Hi Yusuke, > > > Just look at the patch, it seems to me that it wanted to differentiate > every state like "init", "waiting promise", "promised", "waiting accept" > and "accepted", etc ... However I'm afraid in this way, it

Re: [Pacemaker] Improvement for the communication failure of booth

2013-02-12 Thread Jiaju Zhang
Hi Yusuke, On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 11:52 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > 2012/12/18 Jiaju Zhang : > > Good suggestion! I think it may need to introduce a notifier callback so > > that the failure of communicating with the problematic node can be > > notified to the "active" node. This mak

Re: [Pacemaker] Improvement for the communication failure of booth

2013-02-11 Thread yusuke iida
Hi, Jiaju 2012/12/18 Jiaju Zhang : > Good suggestion! I think it may need to introduce a notifier callback so > that the failure of communicating with the problematic node can be > notified to the "active" node. This makes sense for the active node, > because it will make the admin know how many h

Re: [Pacemaker] Improvement for the communication failure of booth

2012-12-17 Thread Jiaju Zhang
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 22:14 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > I would like to attach the function which displays a communicative > state on booth. > In the present booth, when communication between sites stops service, > no errors are told. > If it becomes like this, the user cannot notice

[Pacemaker] Improvement for the communication failure of booth

2012-12-17 Thread yusuke iida
Hi, Jiaju I would like to attach the function which displays a communicative state on booth. In the present booth, when communication between sites stops service, no errors are told. If it becomes like this, the user cannot notice a problem. I think that he would like to define newly the variable