On 26 Jun 2014, at 8:18 am, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Digimer wrote:
> Excellent.
>
> Please note; With IPMI-only fencing, you may find that killing all power to
> the node will cause fencing to fail, as the IPMI's BMC will lose power as
> well (unless it
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Digimer wrote:
> Excellent.
>
> Please note; With IPMI-only fencing, you may find that killing all power
> to the node will cause fencing to fail, as the IPMI's BMC will lose power
> as well (unless it has it's own battery, but most don't).
>
> If you find thi
Excellent.
Please note; With IPMI-only fencing, you may find that killing all
power to the node will cause fencing to fail, as the IPMI's BMC will
lose power as well (unless it has it's own battery, but most don't).
If you find this, then the solution I would recommend is to get a
pair o
Hi Gianluca,
>
> I'm not sure of the CIB XML syntax, but here is how it's done using pcs:
>
OK, thanks Digimer.
It seems it worked this way using your suggestions
[root@srvmgmt01 ~]# pcs stonith show
Fencing(stonith:fence_intelmodular):Started
# pcs cluster cib stonith_separate_cfg
On 21/06/14 04:26 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Hello,
I have a CentOS 6.5 based cluster with
pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3.x86_64
cman-3.0.12.1-59.el6_5.2.x86_64
and configured pacemaker with cman integration.
The nodes are two blades inside an Intel enclosure.
At the moment my configuration has th
Hello,
I have a CentOS 6.5 based cluster with
pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3.x86_64
cman-3.0.12.1-59.el6_5.2.x86_64
and configured pacemaker with cman integration.
The nodes are two blades inside an Intel enclosure.
At the moment my configuration has this in cluster.conf
and this if I r
