Hi Nikola,
I wish I could help, but I am not using Pacemaker for 3 years now, sorry. I
just wanted to thank you for the E-mail subject, it drew a big smile on my
face after a long tiresome not-so-good day. Really, thank you :)
Best regards,
Angie Tawfik
Am 18.05.2015 13:31 schrieb "Nikola Ciprich
19.05.2015 11:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:14:14PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Dejan,
The list below seems too extensive. Which version of
resource-agents do you run?
$ grep 'Build version:' /usr/lib/ocf/lib/heartbeat/ocf-shellfuncs
yes, it's definitely wron
19.05.2015 11:46, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:34:38PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
18.05.2015 18:57, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Vladislav,
Isn't that a bind-mount?
nope, but your question lead me to possible culprit..
it's cephfs mount, when I try to some local fil
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:14:14PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> >
> > The list below seems too extensive. Which version of
> > resource-agents do you run?
> >
> > $ grep 'Build version:' /usr/lib/ocf/lib/heartbeat/ocf-shellfuncs
>
> yes, it's definitely wrong..
>
> here's the
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:34:38PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 18.05.2015 18:57, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> >Hi Vladislav,
> >
> >>
> >>Isn't that a bind-mount?
> >nope, but your question lead me to possible culprit..
> >it's cephfs mount, when I try to some local filesystem, I don't
> >see thi
18.05.2015 18:57, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Vladislav,
Isn't that a bind-mount?
nope, but your question lead me to possible culprit..
it's cephfs mount, when I try to some local filesystem, I don't
see this weird fuser behaviour..
so maybe fuser does not work correctly on cephfs?
yep, for b
Hi Vladislav,
>
> Isn't that a bind-mount?
nope, but your question lead me to possible culprit..
it's cephfs mount, when I try to some local filesystem, I don't
see this weird fuser behaviour..
so maybe fuser does not work correctly on cephfs?
this is how fs is mounted:
10.0.0.1,10.0.0.2,10.0.
18.05.2015 13:20, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi,
I noticed very annoying bug (or so I think), that resource-agents-3.9.5
in RHEL / centos 6 Filesystem OCF resource seems to be killing completely
unrelated processes on shutdown although they're not using anything on mounted
filesystem...
Isn't that
Hi Dejan,
>
> The list below seems too extensive. Which version of
> resource-agents do you run?
>
> $ grep 'Build version:' /usr/lib/ocf/lib/heartbeat/ocf-shellfuncs
yes, it's definitely wrong..
here's the info you've requested:
# Build version: 5434e9646462d2c3c8f7aad2609d0ef1875839c7
rpm
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed very annoying bug (or so I think), that resource-agents-3.9.5
> in RHEL / centos 6 Filesystem OCF resource seems to be killing completely
> unrelated processes on shutdown although they're not using anything o
are you sure you process are not in working directory /home/cluster/virt ?
I'm using suse 11 Sp2 and I don't know if the agent is the same in
redhat 6, but i think so, anyway for umounting the fs the script uses
the following functions Filesystem_stop -> fs_stop -> signal_processes
In the fs_stop
Hi,
I noticed very annoying bug (or so I think), that resource-agents-3.9.5
in RHEL / centos 6 Filesystem OCF resource seems to be killing completely
unrelated processes on shutdown although they're not using anything on mounted
filesystem...
unfortunately, one of processes very often killed is
12 matches
Mail list logo
