On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:06:04AM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 07:17:52AM +0100, Marko Potocnik wrote:
> > Actually the symbolic link is the beautifier. We use different versions of
> > database server and using the symbolic link mount point is always the same.
> >
> > D
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 07:17:52AM +0100, Marko Potocnik wrote:
> Actually the symbolic link is the beautifier. We use different versions of
> database server and using the symbolic link mount point is always the same.
>
> Do I need to do anything else for the patch to make it into the main branch
Actually the symbolic link is the beautifier. We use different versions of
database server and using the symbolic link mount point is always the same.
Do I need to do anything else for the patch to make it into the main branch?
Regards,
Marko
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic w
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:35:01AM +0100, Marko Potocnik wrote:
> If you use symbolic links in Filesystem resource agent directory parameter,
> then monitoring operation fails, because actual mount point in /proc/mounts
> (or the output of mount command) is diferent as the configured one.
Why
On 03/18/2011 11:35 AM, Marko Potocnik wrote:
> If you use symbolic links in Filesystem resource agent directory
> parameter, then monitoring operation fails, because actual mount point
> in /proc/mounts (or the output of mount command) is diferent as the
> configured one.
>
> Here is the patch th
If you use symbolic links in Filesystem resource agent directory parameter,
then monitoring operation fails, because actual mount point in /proc/mounts
(or the output of mount command) is diferent as the configured one.
Here is the patch that fixes this:
--- Filesystem_new_org 2011-03-18 11:32:3
