В Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:07:18 +0100
Tomasz Kontusz пишет:
> I think the suggestion was to put shooting the host in the fencing path of a
> VM. This way if you can't get the host to fence the VM (as the host is
> already dead) you just check if the host was fenced.
>
Exactly. One thing I do not
I think the suggestion was to put shooting the host in the fencing path of a
VM. This way if you can't get the host to fence the VM (as the host is already
dead) you just check if the host was fenced.
Daniel Dehennin napisał:
>Andrei Borzenkov writes:
>
>
>[...]
>
>>> Now I have one issue, whe
Andrei Borzenkov writes:
[...]
>> Now I have one issue, when the bare metal host on which the VM is
>> running die, the VM is lost and can not be fenced.
>>
>> Is there a way to make pacemaker ACK the fencing of the VM running on a
>> host when the host is fenced itself?
>>
>
> Yes, you can d
В Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:46:40 +0100
Daniel Dehennin пишет:
> Hello,
>
> As I finally manage to integrate my VM to corosync and my dlm/clvm/GFS2
> are running on it.
>
> Now I have one issue, when the bare metal host on which the VM is
> running die, the VM is lost and can not be fenced.
>
> Is t
Hello,
As I finally manage to integrate my VM to corosync and my dlm/clvm/GFS2
are running on it.
Now I have one issue, when the bare metal host on which the VM is
running die, the VM is lost and can not be fenced.
Is there a way to make pacemaker ACK the fencing of the VM running on a
host when
