On Aug 22, 2011, at 2:52 AM, Tim Serong wrote:
> On 19/08/11 13:12, Prakash Velayutham wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using
>>
>> pacemaker - 1.1.5-5.5.5
>> corosync - 1.3.0-5.6.1
>> ocfs2 - 1.4.3-0.16.7
>>
>> I will be using 2 OCFS2 volumes for different purposes. Is it enough to have
>> just one i
On 19/08/11 13:12, Prakash Velayutham wrote:
Hi,
I am using
pacemaker - 1.1.5-5.5.5
corosync - 1.3.0-5.6.1
ocfs2 - 1.4.3-0.16.7
I will be using 2 OCFS2 volumes for different purposes. Is it enough to have
just one instance of
ocf:pacemaker:controld
and
ocf:ocfs2:o2cb
or do I need a separate
Hi,
I am using
pacemaker - 1.1.5-5.5.5
corosync - 1.3.0-5.6.1
ocfs2 - 1.4.3-0.16.7
I will be using 2 OCFS2 volumes for different purposes. Is it enough to have
just one instance of
ocf:pacemaker:controld
and
ocf:ocfs2:o2cb
or do I need a separate instance of the above for each OCFS2 volume b