t 3m value.
Thanks,
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Beekhof" < and...@beekhof.net >
To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" < pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 5:25:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Configuring
12:38:23 node1 pengine: [29916]: notice: LogActions: Leave
> p_drbd_r0:1#011(Stopped)
> 12:38:23 node1 pengine: [29916]: notice: LogActions: Leave
> p_drbd_r1:1#011(Stopped)
>
> I've attached the full logs from this time period in addition to the excerpt
> above.
>
> Is there
node are not supported ... but why
> not creating minimal VM instances ... though not to minimal, as you have
> a good chance that theses standby instances become DC role.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> --
> Need help with Pacemaker?
> http://www.hastexo.com/now
>
>>
>> Thanks,
day, January 23, 2012 1:53:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Configuring 3rd Node as Quorum Node in 2 Node Cluster
On 01/23/2012 03:36 PM, Andrew Martin wrote:
> I think I will configure the 3rd (quorum) node in standby mode. In the
> near future I am looking into setting up 2 additional clusters
---
> *From: *"Andreas Kurz"
> *To: *pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> *Sent: *Friday, January 13, 2012 6:35:48 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [Pacemaker] Configuring 3rd Node as Quorum Node in 2
> NodeCluster
>
> On 01/13/2012 12:32 PM, Ivan Savčić | Epix
ubject: Re: [Pacemaker] Configuring 3rd Node as Quorum Node in 2 Node Cluster
On 01/13/2012 12:32 PM, Ivan Savčić | Epix wrote:
> On 1/11/2012 8:28 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
>> Another option would be to permanently run the 3rd node in standby mode.
>
> Just wondering, wouldn't the
On 01/13/2012 12:32 PM, Ivan Savčić | Epix wrote:
> On 1/11/2012 8:28 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
>> Another option would be to permanently run the 3rd node in standby mode.
>
> Just wondering, wouldn't the standby mode prevent that node from
> performing the fencing actions? Also, can it act as DC th
On 1/11/2012 8:28 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
Another option would be to permanently run the 3rd node in standby mode.
Just wondering, wouldn't the standby mode prevent that node from
performing the fencing actions? Also, can it act as DC then?
Thanks,
Ivan
_
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Andrew Martin wrote:
>> 3. Limit the DRBD, nfs, and smbd resources to only node1 and node2 by adding
>> a location rule for the g_nfs group (which includes p_fs_drbd0
>> p_lsb_nfsserver p_exportfs_drbd0 p_ip
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Andrew Martin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am creating a 2 node active/passive cluster for a fileserver (NFS and
> Samba) using DRBD + Heartbeat + Pacemaker on Ubuntu 10.04 following this
> guide: http://www.linbit.com/fileadmin/tech-guides/ha-nfs.pdf. I'd like to
> enabl
Hello,
I am creating a 2 node active/passive cluster for a fileserver (NFS and Samba)
using DRBD + Heartbeat + Pacemaker on Ubuntu 10.04 following this guide:
http://www.linbit.com/fileadmin/tech-guides/ha-nfs.pdf . I'd like to enable
quorum and STONITH to ensure data integrity. Thus I want
11 matches
Mail list logo
