Re: [Pacemaker] Building pacemaker without gnutls

On 13 Aug 2014, at 8:53 am, Oren wrote: > Hi, > Anything you can do will be appreciated. > Regarding the FIPS concern, I hear you but it's never really that black and > white. > One way to look on it is as follows: > 1) Allowing pacemaker to compile with OpenSSL and without GnuTLS (original >

[Pacemaker] Building pacemaker without gnutls

Hi, Anything you can do will be appreciated. Regarding the FIPS concern, I hear you but it's never really that black and white. One way to look on it is as follows: 1) Allowing pacemaker to compile with OpenSSL and without GnuTLS (original post) 2) Making pacemaker a FIPS approved software Alt. 1

Re: [Pacemaker] Building pacemaker without gnutls

On 11 Aug 2014, at 10:33 am, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 8/10/14 7:24 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On 10 Aug 2014, at 7:10 pm, Oren wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Can you support pacemaker without gnutls as it is not FIPS compliant? >> >> Its not? >> >>> This dependency may be replaced by openssl, with a

Re: [Pacemaker] Building pacemaker without gnutls

On 8/10/14 7:24 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 10 Aug 2014, at 7:10 pm, Oren wrote: Hi, Can you support pacemaker without gnutls as it is not FIPS compliant? Its not? This dependency may be replaced by openssl, with a configure flag to control this. We'll certainly consider a patch that di

Re: [Pacemaker] Building pacemaker without gnutls

On 10 Aug 2014, at 7:10 pm, Oren wrote: > Hi, > Can you support pacemaker without gnutls as it is not FIPS compliant? Its not? > This dependency may be replaced by openssl, with a configure flag to control > this. We'll certainly consider a patch that did this. I don't know enough about ope

[Pacemaker] Building pacemaker without gnutls

Hi, Can you support pacemaker without gnutls as it is not FIPS compliant? This dependency may be replaced by openssl, with a configure flag to control this. Thanks, Oren ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.