Hi Andrew,
I confirmed that a patch was applied.
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/devel/rev/6de803ca1a8e
Thanks!
Regards,
Yoshihiko SATO
(2011/07/08 16:44), Yoshihiko SATO wrote:
Hi Andres,
Thank you for comment.
(2011/07/08 14:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM,
Hi Andres,
Thank you for comment.
(2011/07/08 14:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Yoshihiko SATO
wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your quick reply.
I remade the patch by the means to add to existing logic.
(attachment : update_log1.patch)
If it is possible, i want to
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Yoshihiko SATO
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> I remade the patch by the means to add to existing logic.
> (attachment : update_log1.patch)
>
> If it is possible, i want to get also the attribute names of XML("name",
> "value") for log analy
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your quick reply.
I remade the patch by the means to add to existing logic.
(attachment : update_log1.patch)
If it is possible, i want to get also the attribute names of XML("name",
"value") for log analysis.
So, update_log2.patch is better for me.
I would like to hear yo
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Yoshihiko SATO
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for advice.
>
>>
>> In this case I'd just append " $name=$value"
>>
> Sorry, I don't understand..
> Your meaning is checking the attribute name and value that are null or not?
I mean to the log message.
If its TYPE(
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for advice.
In this case I'd just append " $name=$value"
Sorry, I don't understand..
Your meaning is checking the attribute name and value that are null or not?
Regards,
Yoshihiko SATO
(2011/07/05 10:39), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Yoshihik
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Yoshihiko SATO
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
>
> Do you mean that the output logic is branched by some conditions?
Right
> If my understanding is correct, What conditions should we judge?
> "tag"(TYPE(reason)), "abort_text" or otherwise?
>
> -
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your comment.
Do you mean that the output logic is branched by some conditions?
If my understanding is correct, What conditions should we judge?
"tag"(TYPE(reason)), "abort_text" or otherwise?
- TYPE(reason) == "nvpair"
Is it all right judging as attribute update?
2011/6/28 Yoshihiko SATO :
> Hi,
>
> I am setting location to the resource by using pingRA.
>
> location location-grpPostgreSQLDB grpPostgreSQLDB \
> rule -inf: default_ping_set lt 100 \
>
> I watch the log of the DC node for the system observation.
> However, the updated attribute va
Hi,
I am setting location to the resource by using pingRA.
location location-grpPostgreSQLDB grpPostgreSQLDB \
rule -inf: default_ping_set lt 100 \
I watch the log of the DC node for the system observation.
However, the updated attribute values are only one output at each node.
S
10 matches
Mail list logo