Re: [Pacemaker] [Question] About the stop order at the time of the Probe error.

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:14 AM, wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for comments. > >> > Question 1) Is there right setting in cib.xml to evade this problem? >> >> No. >> >> > >> > Question 2) In Pacemaker1.1, does this problem occur? >> >> Yes. I'll see what I can do. >> >> > >> > Question 3) I a

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question] About the stop order at the time of the Probe error.

Hi Andrew, Thank you for comments. > > Question 1) Is there right setting in cib.xml to evade this problem? > > No. > > > > > Question 2) In Pacemaker1.1, does this problem occur? > > Yes. I'll see what I can do. > > > > > Question 3) I added following order. > > > > > > > >

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question] About the stop order at the time of the Probe error.

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:44 PM, wrote: > Hi All, > > We found a problem at the time of Porobe error. > > It is the following simple resource constitution. > > > Last updated: Wed Aug 22 15:19:50 2012 > Stack: Heartbeat > Current DC: drbd1 (6081ac99-d941-40b9-a4a3-9f996ff291c0) - par

[Pacemaker] [Question] About the stop order at the time of the Probe error.

Hi All, We found a problem at the time of Porobe error. It is the following simple resource constitution. Last updated: Wed Aug 22 15:19:50 2012 Stack: Heartbeat Current DC: drbd1 (6081ac99-d941-40b9-a4a3-9f996ff291c0) - partition with quorum Version: 1.0.12-c6770b8 1 Nodes configur