Re: [Pacemaker] eth0:0: warning: name may be invalid

2009-05-29 Thread Ty! Boyack
ectory. The only reason for this is to prevent an upgrade from wiping out your changes. Good luck, -Ty! Димитър Бойн wrote: Thanks a lot! Indeed! - I do have two interfaces on the same network... :) Should this inability be considered a bug? Best Regards! ___ Dimitar Boyn - Or

Re: [Pacemaker] [LIST:Pacemaker] eth0:0: warning: name may be invalid

2009-05-28 Thread Ty! Boyack
I might be wrong, but unless you NEED to specify which interface should carry your alias, you don't need to specify it at all. If you only specify an address, it will try to find an interface that already has an address on the same subnet, and apply your new IP as an alias to that interface.

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-09 Thread Ty! Boyack
s a key and critical component to nearly every system we plan to deploy in the next 5-10 years, and I'm really excited to see it become even more stable and ubiquitous on a variety of distributions. -Ty! Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 20:54, Ty! Boyack wrote: I'm

[Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-08 Thread Ty! Boyack
e up-to-date source trees and compile the parts, but the same question would apply of which pieces need to be installed. I would rather stick with the rpms for management reasons if possible, though. Thanks very much! -Ty! -- -=======- Ty! Boyack NREL Unix Network Manager