On May 10, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Steven Bambling wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2013, at 8:05 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10/05/2013, at 12:40 AM, Steven Bambling wrote:
>>
>>> I'm having some issues with getting some cluster monitoring setup an
On May 9, 2013, at 8:05 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2013, at 12:40 AM, Steven Bambling wrote:
>
>> I'm having some issues with getting some cluster monitoring setup and
>> configured on a 3 node multi-state cluster. I'm using Florian
I'm having some issues with getting some cluster monitoring setup and
configured on a 3 node multi-state cluster. I'm using Florian's blog as an
example
http://floriancrouzat.net/2013/01/monitor-a-pacemaker-cluster-with-ocfpacemakerclustermon-andor-external-agent/.
When I create the primitiv
EAMING|POTENTIAL".
>
> Thanks,
> Takatoshi MATSUO
>
> 2013/4/4 Takatoshi MATSUO :
>> Hi Steven
>>
>> Sorry for late reply
>>
>> 2013/3/29 Steven Bambling :
>>> Taskatoshi/Rainer thanks so much for the quick responses and clarification.
>&
hanks,
Takatoshi MATSUO
2013/4/4 Takatoshi MATSUO :
Hi Steven
Sorry for late reply
2013/3/29 Steven Bambling :
Taskatoshi/Rainer thanks so much for the quick responses and clarification.
In response to the rep_mode being set to sync.
If the master is running the monitor check as low as ev
thest head or near
furthest ahead log location and the LESS replay lag.
Does this even seem possible with a resource agent or is my thinking totally
off?
v/r
STEVE
On Mar 29, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Takatoshi MATSUO
wrote:
> Hi Steven
>
> 2013/3/29 Steven Bambling :
>>
>>
nd compares them to get the highest.
If the highest is this list is the own one, it sets the master-score to 1000,
on other nodes to 100.
Pacemaker then selects the node with the highest master score and promote this.
Rainer
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. März 2013 um 14:37 Uhr
Von: "Steven Bamblin
a?
v/r
STEVE
On Mar 26, 2013, at 8:19 AM, Steven Bambling
mailto:smbambl...@arin.net>> wrote:
Excellent thanks so much for the clarification. I'll drop this new RA in and
see if I can get things working.
STEVE
On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Rainer Brestan
mailto:rainer.bres..
resource add_operation PGSQL monitor interval=7s
v/r
STEVE
On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Steven Bambling wrote:
>
> I've built and installed the lastest resource-agents from github on Centos 6
> and configured two resources
>
> 1 primitive PGVIP:
> pc
I've built and installed the lastest resource-agents from github on Centos 6
and configured two resources
1 primitive PGVIP:
pcs resource create PGVIP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 ip=10.1.22.48 cidr_netmask=25
op monitor interval=1
Before setting up the PGSQL resource I manually configured sync/stre
ienstag, 26. März 2013 um 11:55 Uhr
Von: "Steven Bambling" mailto:smbambl...@arin.net>>
An: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
mailto:pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>>
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] OCF Resource agent promote question
On Mar 26, 2013, at 6:32 AM
gt;
An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org<mailto:pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org>
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] OCF Resource agent promote question
Hi Steve,
On 2013-03-25 18:44, Steven Bambling wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm trying to work on a OCF resource agent that uses postgresql
> streaming repli
ve misinterpreted the use case of this resource, please let me know.
Also any additional hints or corrects would be much appreciated.
v/r
STEVE
On Mar 25, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Andreas Kurz
mailto:andr...@hastexo.com>> wrote:
Hi Steve,
On 2013-03-25 18:44, Steven Bambling wrote:
All,
I
All,
I'm trying to work on a OCF resource agent that uses postgresql streaming
replication. I'm running into a few issues that I hope might be answered or at
least some pointers given to steer me in the right direction.
1. A quick way of obtaining a list of "Online" nodes in the cluster that
+1 I'll try to get my notes up with installing and basic setup on 6.2
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 30, 2012, at 11:47 AM, "Andreas Kurz" wrote:
> On 04/30/2012 05:37 PM, fatcha...@gmx.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I´ve just installed a CentOS 6.2 and also installed via epel-repo
>> heartbeat-3.0.4-1.el
24, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Steven Bambling wrote:
After doing some searching on setting up "PGPool-HA" to limit pgpool being a
single point of failure it looks like development on the heartbeat project has
reduced greatly and development has shifted to corosync (backed by RedHat and
Suse)
After doing some searching on setting up "PGPool-HA" to limit pgpool being a
single point of failure it looks like development on the heartbeat project has
reduced greatly and development has shifted to corosync (backed by RedHat and
Suse) that is recommend by pacemaker.
I've found an article
17 matches
Mail list logo