On Nov 17, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 2013, at 2:28 pm, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>>>>> Yes the varnish resources are in a group which is then cloned.
>>>>
>>>> -EDONTDOTHAT
>>>>
>>>> You cant ref
On Nov 14, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 6:47 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 15 Nov 2013, at 10:24 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof w
> On Nov 14, 2013, at 6:47 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>
>> On 15 Nov 2013, at 10:24 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 14 Nov 2013, at 2:55 pm, Sean Lut
On Nov 14, 2013, at 6:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 14 Nov 2013, at 2:55 pm, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2013, at 10:51 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 14 Nov 2013, at 1:12 pm, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>>
>
On Nov 13, 2013, at 10:51 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 14 Nov 2013, at 1:12 pm, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 10, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>
On Nov 10, 2013, at 8:03 PM, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11 Nov 2013, at 11:44 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 10, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>
On Nov 13, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Sean Lutner napsal(a):
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2013, at 3:15 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew Beekhof napsal(a):
>>>>
>>>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 11:49 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>>>
On Nov 13, 2013, at 3:15 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof napsal(a):
>>
>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 11:49 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:33 PM, Andrew Beekhof
>>>> wrote:
>>
> On Nov 12, 2013, at 7:33 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>
>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 11:22 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 12, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 6:10 am
> On Nov 12, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>
>> On 13 Nov 2013, at 6:10 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>> The folks testing the cluster I've been building have run a script which
>> blocks all traffic except SSH on one node of the cluster
The folks testing the cluster I've been building have run a script which blocks
all traffic except SSH on one node of the cluster for 15 seconds to mimic a
network failure. During this time, the network being "down" seems to cause some
odd behavior from pacemaker resulting in it dying.
The clus
On Nov 10, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 11 Nov 2013, at 11:44 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 8 Nov 2013, at 12:59 pm, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>>
>&g
On Nov 10, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 8 Nov 2013, at 12:59 pm, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 8 Nov 2013, at 4:45 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>>
>>
On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:59 PM, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>> On 8 Nov 2013, at 4:45 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>>> I have a confusing situation that I'm hoping to get help with. Last night
>>>
On Nov 7, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 8 Nov 2013, at 4:45 am, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>> I have a confusing situation that I'm hoping to get help with. Last night
>> after configuring STONITH on my two node cluster, I suddenly have a "gho
I have a confusing situation that I'm hoping to get help with. Last night after
configuring STONITH on my two node cluster, I suddenly have a "ghost" node in
my cluster. I'm looking to understand the best way to remove this node from the
config.
I'm using the fence_ec2 device for for STONITH. I
On Oct 15, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2013, at 12:51 AM, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I'm hoping to get some assistance with a cluster configuration I'm currently
>> working on.
>>
>> The clust
On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 10/10/2013, at 12:52 PM, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>>
On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
>> On 2013-10-08T09:29:14, Sean Lutner wrote:
>>
>>> The clone was created using the interleave=true option, yes.
>>
>> Ok, so pcs hide
On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-10-08T09:29:14, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>> The clone was created using the interleave=true option, yes.
>
> Ok, so pcs hides that (interesting to know).
>
>> Does this have an affect on what I'm tr
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-10-07T11:33:28, Sean Lutner wrote:
>
>> Clone: EIP-AND-VARNISH-clone
>> Group: EIP-AND-VARNISH
>> Resource: Varnish (provider=redhat type=varnish.sh class=ocf)
>>Operations: monitor interval
Hello,
I have a two node pacemaker + CMAN cluster on CentOS 6.4 with the configuration
shown below. I'm struggling to get the resources contained in the
EIP-AND-VARNISH group back online after a failover on the node that failed.
I start with all varnish resources online on both nodes and the EIP
Hello,
I'm hoping to get some assistance with a cluster configuration I'm currently
working on.
The cluster is built on CentOS 6.4 Amazon EC2 systems with:
- pacemaker-1.1.8-7.el6.x86_64
- cman-3.0.12.1-49.el6_4.2.x86_64
Within the cluster I have four resources. One is for a flo
23 matches
Mail list logo
