about this strange thing :)
BR
Robert Lindgren
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.or
: off
timestamp: on
to_syslog: yes
to_file: no
syslog_facility: daemon
}
I'm running on Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS
pacemaker 1.1.6-2ubuntu3.1
corosync 1.4.2-2
cman 3.1.7-0ubuntu2.1
Anybody having some heads up of what I'm missing?
BR
Worked like a charm, except:
crm(live)configure# simulate actions nograph
which I guess is only is available in newer versions.
So big thanks Lars!
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Robert Lindgren wrote:
> Excellent, thanks Lars, this looks the proper way forward! Cheers
>
>
>
Excellent, thanks Lars, this looks the proper way forward! Cheers
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-10-15T09:39:25, Robert Lindgren wrote:
>
> What I'd do is to backup, then wipe the cluster configuration
> (/var/lib/pacemaker/cib/*), resta
Yeah it's a nice idea, but servers are at datacenter, some hours away.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Florian Crouzat wrote:
> Le 15/10/2013 09:39, Robert Lindgren a écrit :
>
> I have a cluster that is offline, and I can't start it to do edits
>> (since IPs and
ter again
>
>
> 2013/10/15 Robert Lindgren
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a cluster that is offline, and I can't start it to do edits (since
>> IPs and so will conflict with old cluster). What is the preferred way of
>> doing the edits (change IPs) so that
Hi,
I have a cluster that is offline, and I can't start it to do edits (since
IPs and so will conflict with old cluster). What is the preferred way of
doing the edits (change IPs) so that I can start the cluster?
Will a normal vim edit on cib.xml be good enough, I read that wasn't an
option in th
I now configured the cluster with STONITH/meatware. And when I issue the
meatclient -c command I can access the GFS filesystem again.
I don't get why, the STONITH/pacemaker must send somethting to GFS to tell
it that it can carry on, any hints on how this is handled? There must be
some command on
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Robert Lindgren
> wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> You do have stonith configured right?
> >>
> >> No :)
> >
> >> Ah, that explains it then
&
and make it work?
>
> Well external/ssh isnt going to work if there's no network access to
> the "bad" node...
>
Any recommendations on how to configure stonith on a test environment here
there is not any physical stonith devices? I want to test this before
productio
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Robert Lindgren
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Andrew Beekhof
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Robert Lindgren
&
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Robert Lindgren
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the hint Andrew,
> >
> > But I feel that I might have missed something with pacemaker config. I
> see
> > that dlm_controld.pcmk
Thanks for the hint Andrew,
But I feel that I might have missed something with pacemaker config. I see
that dlm_controld.pcmk,gfs_controld.pcmk are started OK, which I guess are
doing the maintenance of the GFS things from the cluster side. Are there any
special params needed for dlm_controld and
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Robert Lindgren
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry if this topic has been up before, I'm new to this list.
>
> I have a problem with gfs2_quotad turning up in D
> state, uninterpretable sleep, when I set one of my nodes in standby. Hence
> Vi
imary/primary). I'm running Ubuntu Lucid with the gfs tools from
Cluster-stack ppa.
If one one node is started gfs doesn't behave like this, and when one host
is lost due to standby or powercord yank.
Any hints would be appreciated.
BR
Robert Lindgren
__
15 matches
Mail list logo
