Re: [Pacemaker] Heartbeat Anything cmdline_options vs. Removing active resource from a group

2013-03-05 Thread Reid, Mike
> > Attached is an excerpt from our two node (active/passive) Web cluster. We > > are currently launching uWSGI via the ocf:heartbeat:anything RA (see below). > > > > I would like to make some slight changes to the "cmdline_options" argument > > on our running cluster... (via "crm configure edit")

[Pacemaker] Heartbeat Anything cmdline_options vs. Removing active resource from a group

2013-03-04 Thread Reid, Mike
Attached is an excerpt from our two node (active/passive) Web cluster. We are currently launching uWSGI via the ocf:heartbeat:anything RA (see below). I would like to make some slight changes to the "cmdline_options" argument on our running cluster... (via "crm configure edit") Do I need to sto

Re: [Pacemaker] DRBD Split-brain (recovered), but still showing "Failed Actions"

2012-04-11 Thread Reid, Mike
cemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] DRBD Split-brain (recovered), but still > showing "Failed Actions" >Message-ID: <4f84b03a.4030...@hastexo.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >On 04/10/2012 05:43 PM, Reid

Re: [Pacemaker] DRBD Split-brain (recovered), but still showing "Failed Actions"

2012-04-10 Thread Reid, Mike
11:23:41 +0200 >From: Andreas Kurz >To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] DRBD Split-brain (recovered), but still > showing "Failed Actions" >Message-ID: <4f83fc1d.9010...@hastexo.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1&

[Pacemaker] DRBD Split-brain (recovered), but still showing "Failed Actions"

2012-04-09 Thread Reid, Mike
We recently had a DRBD (v8.3.12) split brain scenario on our two-node Active/Passive web cluster. The failover worked as expected, and we were manually able to resolve the split brain scenario without issue. However, CRM MON is still showing the following "Failed Actions" which I would like to

[Pacemaker] IP Range Failover with IPaddr2 and clone / globally-unique="true"

2012-01-25 Thread Reid, Mike
Anton, FWIW, I ran into the same issue not being able to ping IPs created this wayŠwhen I checked "iptables -L" I realized that there were firewall rules created that needed to be accounted for. What worked for me was to try two things: 1.) If you can, temporarily disable your firewall to ensure

[Pacemaker] IP Range Failover with IPaddr2 and clone / globally-unique="true"

2012-01-24 Thread Reid, Mike
You would think so :) I waited 2-3x the monitor interval in hopes the Failed resources would eventually be setup, but that was not the case. To Dejan's point, I could have checked the logs to look for something more specific, but I did not. I've not heard of ocf_tester, perhaps it could shed some l

Re: [Pacemaker] IP Range Failover with IPaddr2 and clone / globally-unique="true"

2012-01-23 Thread Reid, Mike
D" IP starts I was receiving. No worries, however, I am very happy with IPaddr2 as a VIP solution, I was just hoping I could take advantage of the simplified configuration (much easier on the eyes) ;) Best, - Mike >Hi, > >On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:05:34PM +, Reid, Mike wrote: >&

Re: [Pacemaker] IP Range Failover with IPaddr2 and clone / globally-unique="true"

2012-01-23 Thread Reid, Mike
FYI, The solution turned out to be related to IPTABLES rules that were added using this approach. By adding a custom IPTables "CLUSTERIP" chain, the firewall started letting everything through :) Unfortunately, it seems that this approach is somewhat experimental and not very stable, so while I

[Pacemaker] IP Range Failover with IPaddr2 and clone / globally-unique="true"

2012-01-20 Thread Reid, Mike
Dejan, Yes, thank you. I realized I was missing "unique_clone_address" in the config, which made _most_ of the difference. However, now I'm seeing some weirdness with regards to ARP -- In my setup, I currently have three elastic IPs configured (effectively a small sample of my intended IP Range),

[Pacemaker] IP Range Failover with IPaddr2 and clone / globally-unique="true"

2012-01-16 Thread Reid, Mike
Greetings! I am wondering if anyone here might be familiar with managing IP ranges in Pacemaker? (e.g. via ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 and clone / globally-unique="true"...I am using Pacemaker v1.0.9) The reason I ask is because I'm only seeing the first IP address get created and am wondering if per

Re: [Pacemaker] OCFS2 problems when connectivity lost

2011-12-21 Thread Reid, Mike
Ivan, Can you post your configuration? Do you have STONITH enabled? I ran into similar issues in our Active/Active OCFS2/DRBD until we had a functioning STONITH, fwiw. ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.or

[Pacemaker] Two-node cluster, able to function with only a single-node?

2011-12-12 Thread Reid, Mike
I've been doing a lot of testing while I've been learning Pacemaker/Heartbeat, DRBD, OCFS2, etc (Nginx, PHP-FPM, Apache…) Below I've attached my working CIB, but I worry I am missing something obvious (or perhaps going about it incorrectly altogether): It seems I cannot start the cluster as a s

Re: [Pacemaker] How to prevent locked I/O using Pacemaker with Primary/Primary DRBD/OCFS2 (Ubuntu 10.10)

2011-04-06 Thread Reid, Mike
Lars, Thank you for your comments. I did confirm I was running 8.3.8.1, and I have even upgraded to 8.3.10 but am still experiencing the same I/O lock issue. I definitely agree with you, DRBD is behaving exactly as instructed, being properly fenced, etc. I am quite new to DRBD (and OCFS2), lea