Re: [Pacemaker] override node name when using cman

2012-09-01 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Thu Aug 30 2012 23:00:25 GMT-0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Beekhof To: Patrick H. The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] override node name when using cman On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Patrick H. wrote: Sent: Wed Aug 29 2012 08:00:53 GMT-0400 (EDT) From

Re: [Pacemaker] override node name when using cman

2012-08-29 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Wed Aug 29 2012 08:00:53 GMT-0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Beekhof To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] override node name when using cman On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Patrick Hemmer wrote: It looks like when using pacemaker with cman, pacemaker gets the nam

Re: [Pacemaker] IPaddr2 for tow nodes in a different VLAN

2012-01-18 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Wed Jan 18 2012 11:21:29 GMT-0500 (EST) From: will mad To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Subject: [Pacemaker] IPaddr2 for tow nodes in a different VLAN Hi, I have a two nodes cluster but each node resides in a specific VLAN : node1 : ip=10.32.3.59 on VLAN1 10.32.3.0 node2 : ip=10.32.2.59

[Pacemaker] cman multi-homed with udp-broadcast issues

2012-01-06 Thread Patrick H.
So I'm trying to setup a cluster with a secondary communication ring in case the first ring fails. The cluster operates fine, but doesnt seem to handle path failure properly. When I break the path between the 2 nodes on ring 1, I get the following in the logs: Jan 6 16:55:17 syslog02.cms.usa.

Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster

2011-12-01 Thread Patrick H.
Yes. P.S. Dont remove the mailing list from the recipients. Bad etiquette :-) Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 14:50:21 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Charles DeVoe To: Patrick H. Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster That document says to remove the pacemaker plugin. Should I start pacemaker as a

Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster

2011-12-01 Thread Patrick H.
DeVoe To: Patrick H. Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster Is there some documentation on how to set up option 3? corosync + cpg + cman + mcp Do I simply start up pacemaker Also, what is cpg? --- On *Thu, 12/1/11, Patrick H. //* wrote: From: Patrick H. Subject: Re

Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster

2011-12-01 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 11:34:39 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Charles DeVoe To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Subject: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster I've spent the last month or so building linux clusters. 2 of them in a VM environment on fedora 15. I went through the Clusters from Scratch Tutorial; wh

Re: [Pacemaker] What versions should we be using and where to get packages?

2011-12-01 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 10:17:06 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Max Williams To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager (pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org) Subject: [Pacemaker] What versions should we be using and where to get packages? Hi All, Are the very latest versions of pacemaker and corosync the mos

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issue with master-slave resources

2011-11-30 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Mon Nov 28 2011 16:10:01 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Patrick H. To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Andreas Kurz Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issue with master-slave resources Sent: Mon Nov 28 2011 15:27:10 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Andrew Beekhof To: The Pacemaker cluster resource

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issue with master-slave resources

2011-11-28 Thread Patrick H.
upgrade might also help On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Patrick H. wrote: Sent: Mon Nov 28 2011 01:31:22 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Andreas Kurz To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issue with master-slave resources On 11/28/2011 04:51 AM, Patrick H. wrote

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issue with master-slave resources

2011-11-28 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Mon Nov 28 2011 01:31:22 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Andreas Kurz To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issue with master-slave resources On 11/28/2011 04:51 AM, Patrick H. wrote: I'm trying to setup a colocation rule so that a couple of master-

[Pacemaker] colocation issue with master-slave resources

2011-11-27 Thread Patrick H.
I'm trying to setup a colocation rule so that a couple of master-slave resources cant be master unless another resource is running on the same node, and am getting the exact opposite of what I want. The master-slave resources are getting promoted to master on the node which this other resource

Re: [Pacemaker] Syntax highlighting in vim for crm configure edit

2011-11-21 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Mon Nov 21 2011 13:27:02 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Trevor Hemsley To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Syntax highlighting in vim for crm configure edit Patrick H. wrote: Sent: Tue Nov 15 2011 02:47:59 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] To: The

Re: [Pacemaker] Syntax highlighting in vim for crm configure edit

2011-11-21 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Tue Nov 15 2011 02:47:59 GMT-0700 (MST) From: Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Syntax highlighting in vim for crm configure edit hi! On 2011-08-19 16:28, Dan Frincu wrote: Hi, On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Digimer wrote: On 08

[Pacemaker] cluster.conf log facility setting discarded if pacemakerd running as a daemon

2011-11-06 Thread Patrick H.
I'm using cman and have been trying to set the syslog facility for all of the pacemaker processes (crmd, lrmd, etc) without much luck. So after google searches failing me on how to configure the syslog facility for pacemaker when launched from cman, I went digging through the source and found m

Re: [Pacemaker] Antwort: IPaddr2 resource IP unavailable on 'lo' interface for brief period after start

2011-08-30 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Mon Aug 29 2011 02:50:33 GMT-0600 (MST) From: alexander.kra...@basf.com To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: [Pacemaker] Antwort: IPaddr2 resource IP unavailable on 'lo' interface for brief period after start "Patrick H." schrieb am 27.08.2011 1

[Pacemaker] IPaddr2 resource IP unavailable on 'lo' interface for brief period after start

2011-08-27 Thread Patrick H.
So the issue is that whenever I start up an IP with an IPaddr2 resource, the IP is unavailable when attempting to connect via lo interface for approximately 21 seconds after the resource is started. What I am doing is starting up the IP resource, and then I have another resource that tries to

Re: [Pacemaker] rpm for 1.1.4

2011-02-02 Thread Patrick H.
Chepkov wrote: On Feb 1, 2011 7:12 PM, "Larry Brigman" wrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Patrick H. wrote: I'm coming from bug 2542 where it was recommended that I try release 1.1.4. Well I'm having problems simply getting it installed. Th

[Pacemaker] rpm for 1.1.4

2011-02-01 Thread Patrick H.
I'm coming from bug 2542 where it was recommended that I try release 1.1.4. Well I'm having problems simply getting it installed. This is on a RHEL5 box Firstly the rpm source file for fedora-13 is broken (http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/fedora-13/src/pacemaker-1.1.4-1.3.fc13.src.rpm). When at

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker EPEL 6 Availability?

2011-01-25 Thread Patrick H.
Pacemaker is already in the base RHEL6 repo. However when I tried to use this package, it produced tons of python errors upon launching 'crm'. Your mileage may vary. -Patrick Sent: Tue Jan 25 2011 12:36:45 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time) From: Ryan Kish To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Subj

Re: [Pacemaker] Speed up resource failover?

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick H.
Oh, and its not waiting for the resource to stop on the other node before it starts it up either. Here's the lrmd log for resource vip_55.63 from the 'ha02' node (the node I put into standby) Jan 12 16:10:24 ha02 lrmd: [5180]: info: rsc:vip_55.63:1444: stop Jan 12 16:10:24 ha02 lrmd: [5180]:

Re: [Pacemaker] Speed up resource failover?

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Wed Jan 12 2011 09:25:39 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Patrick H. To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Speed up resource failover? Sent: Wed Jan 12 2011 01:56:31 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Lars Ellenberg To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

Re: [Pacemaker] Speed up resource failover?

2011-01-12 Thread Patrick H.
@oss.clusterlabs.org; From: Patrick H. Sent: Wed 12-01-2011 00:06 Subject:[Pacemaker] Speed up resource failover? Attachment: inline.txt As it is right now, pacemaker seems to take a long time (in computer terms) to fail over resources from one node to the other. Right now, I have 477

[Pacemaker] Speed up resource failover?

2011-01-11 Thread Patrick H.
As it is right now, pacemaker seems to take a long time (in computer terms) to fail over resources from one node to the other. Right now, I have 477 IPaddr2 resources evenly distributed among 2 nodes. When I put one node in standby, it takes approximately 5 minutes to move the half of those fro

Re: [Pacemaker] symmetric anti-collocation

2010-12-20 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Sat Nov 13 2010 04:20:56 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Andrew Beekhof To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] symmetric anti-collocation On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Alan Jones wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always)

2010-12-15 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Wed Dec 15 2010 09:10:12 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Dejan Muhamedagic To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always) Hi, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:08:52PM -0700, Patrick H. wrote: Sent: Mon Dec 13 2010 15:19:48

Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources

2010-12-14 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Tue Dec 14 2010 11:37:06 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Dejan Muhamedagic To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources Hi, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:43:36PM -0700, Patrick H. wrote: After

Re: [Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources

2010-12-13 Thread Patrick H.
colocation and order. This *appears* to function as intended, but if anyone can point out any pitfalls I'd appreciate it -Patrick Sent: Mon Dec 13 2010 21:12:04 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Patrick H. To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: [Pacemaker] continue starting

[Pacemaker] continue starting chain with failed group resources

2010-12-13 Thread Patrick H.
Is there a way to continue down a chain of starting resources once a previous resource hast tried to start, no matter if the try was successful or not? I've got 3 iSCSI resources which are in a group, and then an md raid-5 array as another resource. I have the raid array resource set to start

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always)

2010-12-13 Thread Patrick H.
Sent: Mon Dec 13 2010 15:19:48 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Pavlos Parissis To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always) If you put all of them in a group and have the nfs_sdb1 as last resource you will manage to have what you

[Pacemaker] colocation issues (isnt it always)

2010-12-12 Thread Patrick H.
So colocation is biting me in the ass again and I cant figure this one out. I have a group of iSCSI devices that then go into an md raid device that then goes into an lvm device which then gets mounted and then exported by nfs. Thoughout this whole project I've had the resources trying to start

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation rule not obeyed

2010-11-30 Thread Patrick H .
ekhof To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation rule not obeyed In general, its better to have the IP (primitive) depend on the clone. eg: With that it behaved properly here. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Patrick H. wrote: Err, now its att

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation rule not obeyed

2010-11-29 Thread Patrick H .
Err, now its attached. Promise :-) -Patrick Sent: Mon Nov 29 2010 08:36:04 GMT-0700 (Mountain Standard Time) From: Patrick H. To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation rule not obeyed `cibadmin -Q` output is attached From what I can see, it did run a

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation rule not obeyed

2010-11-29 Thread Patrick H.
, Patrick H. wrote: I've got a replicated mysql with vip setup i've been trying to create, and it doesnt seem to be obeying my colocation rule much. Situation: I had shut down corosync on all (3) nodes and verified all associated services were off. I then started it up an all 3 nodes. Wh

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation rule not obeyed

2010-11-29 Thread Patrick H .
dard Time) From: Andrew Beekhof To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] colocation rule not obeyed On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Patrick H. wrote: I've got a replicated mysql with vip setup i've been trying to create, and it doesnt seem to be

[Pacemaker] colocation rule not obeyed

2010-11-28 Thread Patrick H .
I've got a replicated /mysql with vip/ setup i've been trying to create, and it doesnt seem to be obeying my colocation rule much. Situation: I had shut down corosync on all (3) nodes and verified all associated services were off. I then started it up an all 3 nodes. When it came back up, the