Am 18.04.2014 um 07:47 schrieb Nikola Ciprich :
> Hello,
>
> I've hit internal limit of PCMK_ipc_buffer on one of my cluster.
> Unfortunately I'm using corosync + plugin configuration (which I
> know is discouraged, so I'll switch this production cluster to CMAN
> ASAP), however, I tried setting P
Am 18.03.2014 um 00:02 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 17 Mar 2014, at 11:26 pm, Gianluca Cecchi
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am in the process of migrating away from the pcmk plugin for corosync and
>>> converting
Am 24.02.2014 um 12:53 schrieb fatcha...@gmx.de:
>
> so the only solution is to migrate from openais to cman ? Is there a less
> painful way?
the "supported" solution is with cman, it does not mean that other stacks do
not
work, (to use your wording) there are just more "painful".
Check the
Am 17.12.2013 um 23:04 schrieb Leon Fauster :
> Hello,
>
> on EL after updating from 6.4 to 6.5 respectively pacemaker-1.1.8 to
> pacemaker-1.1.10
> i can't move resources anymore. Any hints would be great. Description as
> follows:
>
>
> # pcs resource m
Hello,
on EL after updating from 6.4 to 6.5 respectively pacemaker-1.1.8 to
pacemaker-1.1.10
i can't move resources anymore. Any hints would be great. Description as
follows:
# pcs resource move group-Web srvb.local
Error: error moving/banning/clearing resource
Error performing operation: Unk
Am 15.07.2013 um 14:21 schrieb Leon Fauster :
> Am 10.07.2013 um 16:31 schrieb Ron Kerry :
>> What is the suggested way to configure a highly available NFS service using
>> cman/pacemaker in RHEL6.4?
>>
>> RHEL 6.4 has two init.d scripts - nfs and nfslock. The avail
Am 10.07.2013 um 16:31 schrieb Ron Kerry :
> What is the suggested way to configure a highly available NFS service using
> cman/pacemaker in RHEL6.4?
>
> RHEL 6.4 has two init.d scripts - nfs and nfslock. The available pacemaker
> resource agent script in /usr/libocf/resource.d/heartbeat/nfsserv
Am 04.07.2013 um 12:02 schrieb andreas graeper :
>
> i tried to change the IPaddr2 parameter ip
>
> 1) crm resource edit
>
> 2) pcs resource update =
>
> in both cases the cib is modified (`crm configure show` shows)
> but old ip only is pingable and all depending resources are stopped
Am 02.07.2013 um 01:35 schrieb Andreas Mock :
> Hi Leon,
>
> thank you for the pointer to the manuals. I read it already.
>
> My 2-node-cluster seems not to fence the other node
> at startup. And I do not have an explanation. That's the reason
> I asked (after reading the docs).
>
> - CMAN_QUORU
Am 01.07.2013 um 14:28 schrieb Andreas Mock :
> Hi all,
>
> just want to get clear about startup fencing.
>
> Scenario: RHEL 6.4, cman, 2-node-cluster, pacemaker,
> fence via pcmk-redirect. pacemaker stonith enabled,
> no-quorum-policy=ignore, CMAN_QUORUM_TIMEOUT=0
>
>
> When should a startup f
Am 21.06.2013 um 12:56 schrieb andreas graeper :
> maybe i asked this before, but i could not find message + answer.
>
> when a resource gets unmanaged and the problems has gone, i want the resource
> get managed by pacemaker again. what is to do ?
what about:
$ crm resource meta resXYZ set i
Am 22.03.2013 um 03:39 schrieb pacema...@feystorm.net:
>
>>
>> Looks like your non-redundant cluster-communication was interrupted at
>> around that time for whatever reason and your cluster split-brained.
>>
>> Does the drbd-replication use a different network-connection? If yes,
>> why not usi
Am 21.03.2013 um 13:32 schrieb Ron Kerry :
> I believe I understand how to configure CMAN to work with corosync and
> pacemaker, but I do not really understand what roles these three packages all
> play. Perhaps this information is exposed in the written documentation that
> is available in vari
Am 19.03.2013 um 03:16 schrieb 정진환 :
> Hello there!
>
> I have two nodes with pacemaker. Other resources act as I think, but when VIP
> failed(shutdown network device by ifdown command), tomcat resource also
> stopped.
> Is this normal situation? Tomcat resource is configured by
> ocf::heartbe
Am 15.03.2013 um 10:49 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:48:16PM -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote:
>> Hi!! Two quick questions.
>>
>> 1. I have a resource that many other resources depend on. I need to
>> modify this "base" resource, but if I modify this resource whi
Am 04.03.2013 um 18:20 schrieb Leon Fauster :
> okay - recap:
>
> 1st. i have this delay where the two nodes dont see each
> other (after rebooting) and the result are resources running on both
> nodes while they should only run on one node - this will be corrected
> by t
Am 12.03.2013 um 00:32 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
> A small but important distinction...
> The plugin has never been supported on RHEL. What it changing is that
> at some point it will no longer be _supplied_ either.
>
> In fact prior to 6.4, Pacemaker only had Tech Preview status - using
> the C
Am 14.03.2013 um 20:03 schrieb "Maxwell, Jamison [HDS]" :
> I was actually able to get the crm shell back onto a system
> that I had upgraded unawares of the removal of the tool.
> How bad an idea is that?
Pacemaker is currently listed as Tech Preview:
https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/doc
Am 09.03.2013 um 18:15 schrieb "jonas" :
>
> hi,
> I have build a 2 node test cluster on debian 6 withe an IP recourse. If
> I start both nodes the IP recourse starts up properly. If i put one node
> on standby the recourse migrates to the other, but if one node gos down
> the recourse doesn't mig
Am 06.03.2013 um 05:14 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Leon Fauster
> wrote:
>>
>> So far all good. I am doing some stress test now and noticed that rebooting
>> one node (n2), that node (n2) will be marked as standby in the cib (shown on
Dear list,
just to excuse the triviality - i started to deploy a ha environment
in a test lab and therefore i do not have much experience.
i started to setup a 2-node cluster
corosync-1.4.1-15.el6.x86_64
pacemaker-1.1.8-7.el6.x86_64
cman-3.0.12.1-49.el6.x86_64
with rhel6.3 and then s
21 matches
Mail list logo
