Hi Alexis,
Sorry, I didn't work with drbd.
Try to look here
http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-crmsh/html-single/Clusters_from_Scratch/
.
Thank you,
Kostya
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/
Hi Kristoffer,
Thank you for the help.
I will let you know if I see the same with the latest version.
On Feb 9, 2015 10:07 AM, "Kristoffer Grönlund" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kostiantyn Ponomarenko writes:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I saw this during applying the
3182] isis-seth943f pacemakerd: notice:
pcmk_shutdown_worker:Shuting down Pacemaker
Thank you,
Kostya
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko <
konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I saw this during applying the configuration using a script with crmsh
Hi guys,
I saw this during applying the configuration using a script with crmsh
commands:
+ crm configure primitive STONITH_node-1 stonith:fence_avid_sbb_hw
+ crm configure primitive STONITH_node-0 stonith:fence_avid_sbb_hw params
delay=10
+ crm configure location dont_run_STONITH_node-1_on_node-
Chrissie, thank you! =)
It helps!
Thank you,
Kostya
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Christine Caulfield
wrote:
> On 02/05/2015 01:47 PM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
> > Chrissie, one more thing.
> >
> > And I also suppose that the key is read only one time at the start-u
Chrissie, one more thing.
And I also suppose that the key is read only one time at the start-up of
the Corosync.
In other words there is no any check for the presence of the key or its
update, while Corosync is working.
Am I right?
Thank you,
Kostya
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Kostiantyn
Hi Chrissie,
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Christine Caulfield
wrote:
> as corosync rejects the messages
> with the wrong authkey
>
And I suppose that it is enough just to use "crypto_hash" option.
I am right?
Thank you,
Kostya
___
Pacemaker mail
Hi Chrissie,
I know that this setup it crazy thing =)
First of all I needed to say - think about each two-node cluster as one box
with two nodes.
> You can't connect clusters together like that.
I know that.
>All nodes in the cluster have just 1 authkey file.
That is true. But in this example th
Hi all,
Here is a situation - there are two "two-node" clusters.
They have totally identical configuration.
Nodes in the clusters are connected directly, without any switches.
Here is a part of corosync.comf file:
totem {
version: 2
cluster_name: mycluster
transport: udpu
crypto_hash: sha256
c
Hi all,
I've been looking for a good answer to my question, but all information I
found is ambiguous.
I hope to get a good answer here =)
The only description about "active" and "passive" modes I found is:
Active: both rings will be active, in use
Passive: only one of the 2 rings is in us
t; By that I mean that as long as you don't shutdown interface everything
> will work as expected. Interface shutdown is administrator decision,
> system doesn't do it automagically :)
>
> Regards,
> Honza
>
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Kostya
> &
One more thing to clarify.
You said "rebind can be avoided" - what does it mean?
Thank you,
Kostya
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko <
konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you. Now I am aware of it.
>
> Thank you,
> Kostya
>
>
Thomas,
There was a need for me to run the latest cluster stuff on Debian 7.
So I created a document for myself to use.
I don't claim this doc to be the best way to go, but it works for me.
I hope it will work for you as well.
Here is the doc's content:
Software
-
libqb 0.17.0
-
Hi Thomas,
I don't remember starting from which version of Pacemaker "crmsh" is not
included in it anymore.
It goes as a independent product.
You can get it back.
Here is the link https://github.com/crmsh/crmsh/ .
Build and install =)
Thank you,
Kostya
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Kristoffer
put in a standby mode
> (shows:
> >>> communication error),
> >>>
> >>> and it is possible that the cluster is running all resources, but
> applied
> >>> configuration is not guaranteed to be fully loaded (some rules can be
> >>> missed).
> >
see comments to the bug) the
> > cluster will work, but in that case its working state is unstable and the
> > cluster can stop working every moment.
> >
> >
> > So, is it correct? Does my assumptions make any sense? I didn't any other
> > explanation in
---
It is possible that in some rare cases (see comments to the bug) the
cluster will work, but in that case its working state is unstable and the
cluster can stop working every moment.
So, is it correct? Does my assumptions make any sense? I didn't any other
explanation
Hi guys,
Corosync fails to start if there is no such network interface configured in
the system.
Even with "rrp_mode: passive" the problem is the same when at least one
network interface is not configured in the system.
Is this the expected behavior?
I thought that when you use redundant rings, i
Fair enough, thank you!
Thank you,
Kostya
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 22 Sep 2014, at 11:50 pm, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko <
> konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Could you help me to understand the
Hi guys,
Could you help me to understand the reason to build "crm_uuid" only
when supporting heartbeat?
My situation is the next, I am trying to build Pacemaker's sources for
Debian. I built the sources from Debian Wheezy repo (removed
"--with-heartbeat" from it). Then I did the same but using so
Hi Chrissie,
You mentioned "testquorum" in your doc ("Whatever happened to cman") as
it's a good place if you are thinking about writing your own quorum module.
The only file I found in corosync code is in /test folder and I think it's
not the module. Could you please point me where I can find thi
Hi Vijay B,
I have 2 Debian machines with the latest Corosync and Pacemaker.
I wanted the latest versions of these packages, so I didn't use "apt-get
install corosync pacemaker".
Instead of that I downloaded the sources, built it and installed it.
I have a document with all steps I did to get it w
Digimer,
Yes, wait_for_all is a part of votequorum in Corosync v2.
Thank you,
Kostya
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 24/06/14 03:55 AM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
>
>> On 23/06/14 15:49, Digimer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Kostya,
>>>
>>>I'm having a little trouble understanding
ine Caulfield
wrote:
> On 24/06/14 09:36, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>> Hi Chrissie,
>>
>> But wait_for_all doesn't help when there is no connection between the
>> nodes.
>> Because in case I need to reboot the remaining working node I won't get
>
for you, once
>> setup properly. What operating system do you plan to use, and what
>> cluster stack? I suspect it will be corosync + pacemaker, which should
>> work fine.
>>
>> digimer
>>
>> On 23/06/14 10:36 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
>>
>&g
r to keep them
>> down?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Kostya
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Digimer > <mailto:li...@alteeve.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> On 23/06/14 09:11 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys
checks somehow connection between the
two nodes and decides to run corosync and pacemaker or to keep them down?
Thank you,
Kostya
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 23/06/14 09:11 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>> I want to gather all poss
Hi guys,
I want to gather all possible configuration variants for 2-node cluster,
because it has a lot of pitfalls and there are not a lot of information
across the internet about it. And also I have some questions about
configurations and their specific problems.
VARIANT 1:
-
We
Andrew, many thanks!
On Jun 18, 2014 2:11 AM, "Andrew Beekhof" wrote:
>
> On 17 Jun 2014, at 8:01 pm, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko <
> konstantin.ponomare...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I took a look at the include folders of pacemaker and corosync and I
> didn'
I took a look at the include folders of pacemaker and corosync and I didn't
find there any explanation to functions. Did I look at a wrong place?
My goal is to manage cluster from my app, so I don't need to use crmsh or
pcs.
Any ideas are appreciated.
_
nly the node which
doesn't have the lowest nodeid?
Am I right?
Thank you,
Kostya
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Christine Caulfield
wrote:
> On 12/06/14 00:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> Chrissy? Can you shed some light here?
>>
>> On 11 Jun 2014, at
the lowest nodeid we lose all.
So I can lose only the node which doesn't have the lowest nodeid?
And it's not useful in 2 node cluster.
Am i correct?
Thank you,
Kostya
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 11.06.2014 16:26, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
&
Hi guys,
I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster
using votequorum.
Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
provider: corosync_votequorum
expected_votes: 2
wait_for_all: 1
last_man_standing: 1
auto_tie_breaker: 1
My question is about behavior of the remainin
Honza,
Can you please explain what does "network based" mean?
Thank you,
Kostya
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> > I am not quite understand how auto_tie_breaker works.
> > Say we have a cluster with 2 nodes and enabled auto_tie_breaker feature.
> > Each node has 2 NICs.
I am not quite understand how auto_tie_breaker works.
Say we have a cluster with 2 nodes and enabled auto_tie_breaker feature.
Each node has 2 NICs. One NIC is used for cluster communication and another
one is used for providing some services from the cluster.
So the question is how the nodes will
35 matches
Mail list logo
