[Pacemaker] Resource options for group.

2010-03-09 Thread Kees
Hi, I'm a bit confused about recource options for a group. Does a resource group need options like 'target-role' and 'is-managed? According to the 'Pacemake_explained' normal (simple) resources have got a default 'target-role=started', so i asume i do not have to configure those for the resour

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem: No space left on device.

2010-03-09 Thread Kees
Hello Andrew/Thomas, Stupid me it was indeed an inode problem, nothing to do with the cluster-software. The /var/lib/pengine directory was a bit full. //I configured the pe-*-serires-max options so this should not happen again, thanks. On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Kees wrote

[Pacemaker] Problem: No space left on device.

2010-03-05 Thread Kees
Debian-packages from madkiss. Greeting, Kees Thanks in advance for your help. Kees Koehoorn ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Re: [Pacemaker] drbd doesn't work on simple 2-node cluster.

2010-02-12 Thread Kees
ms resource gets promoted. Op 11-2-2010 11:03, Alexandr Krylovskiy schreef: On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:42:42 +0100 Kees wrote: Hello Andrew/All, Thanks. It works again. This is what I had running after I wanted to move on to a 3-node cluster. Two drbd-nodes for storage and one as a webserver

Re: [Pacemaker] drbd doesn't work on simple 2-node cluster.

2010-02-10 Thread Kees
-nodes back to where they are now. Right? PS I'm a newbie to this so sorry this stupid mistake! Greetings, Kees Koehoorn target-role="Started"<--- this isnt going to be helping. nor is symmetric-cluster="false" without defining any location constraints. On W

Re: [Pacemaker] drbd doesn't work on simple 2-node cluster.

2010-02-10 Thread Kees
drbd_websites:promote websites:start property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ expected-quorum-votes="1024" \ dc-version="1.0.7-54d7869bfe3691eb723b1d47810e5585d8246b58" \ cluster-infrastructure="openais" \ no-quorum-policy="ignor

[Pacemaker] drbd doesn't work on simple 2-node cluster.

2010-02-09 Thread Kees
false" \ last-lrm-refresh="1265725342" drbd.conf: global { usage-count yes; } common { protocol C; } resource r0 { device /dev/drbd0; meta-disk internal; on test1 { disk /dev/sda11; address 10.100.5.1:7789; } on test2 { disk /dev/sda10; address 10.100.5.2:7789; } } Thanks in advance for your help. Kees Koehoorn ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

[Pacemaker] DRBD resource over it's own crosscable?

2009-12-29 Thread Kees
cond ring, when i try to do that i get an error: status = Marking ringid 1 interface 192.168.0.1 FAULTY - adminisrtative intervention required. I seems corosync.conf has to be the same on all nodes, is that true? if so, is there a way to let the drdb work on is own link?

Re: [Pacemaker] aisexec high cputime on debian

2009-10-19 Thread Kees Hoekzema
Never mind, I found it in Mercurial; http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/33da369d36e3 Applied the fix, rebuilded the packages and it seems to work nicely again. -kees > -Original Message- > From: Kees Hoekzema [mailto:k...@tweakers.net] > Sent: maandag 19 oktobe

Re: [Pacemaker] aisexec high cputime on debian

2009-10-19 Thread Kees Hoekzema
h and rebuild the packages myself if I just knew where to apply this fix. So does anyone know in which file this fix should be, or does anyone have a patch for this somewhere? -kees ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http:

[Pacemaker] aisexec high cputime on debian

2009-10-18 Thread Kees Hoekzema
estion: Is it normal for aisexec, using these packages, to consume this much cpu? If it is not, how can I fix it, and if it is normal; is there a way to make it consume less cpu? The cpu in this server is an X5570, one of the fastest CPU's you can get n