Re: [Pacemaker] Monitor a resource without the cluster reacting to the result...

2009-03-27 Thread Joe Bill
--- On Tue, 3/24/09, foxyc...@yahoo.com wrote: > ... what command should I type to cause the cluster to > perform a "monitor" operation at a specific check level on > that resource, and return the appropriate OCF status of the > operation, *without* the cluster reacting like triggering a > failo

Re: [Pacemaker] Monitor a resource without the cluster reacting to the result...

2009-03-27 Thread Joe Bill
--- On Fri, 3/27/09, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> I saw later that you want to prevent the cluster >>> from doing anything for the resource, simply set >>> is-managed=false for the resource in question. >> This is incorrect. I want the cluster to react to >> everything BUT to this specific invoca

Re: [Pacemaker] Monitor a resource without the cluster reacting to the result...

2009-03-27 Thread Joe Bill
--- On Thu, 3/26/09, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> what command should I type to cause the cluster >> to perform a "monitor" operation at a specific check >> level on that resource, and return the appropriate >> OCF status of the operation, *without* the cluster >> reacting like triggering a fai

Re: [Pacemaker] Monitor a resource without the cluster reacting to the result...

2009-03-25 Thread Joe Bill
Hi Dominik! dk at in-telegence wrote: >> I'd love to see something like: >> >> # crm_resource -m check_level resource_id >> .. > >This should be possible: > >export OCF_ROOT=/usr/lib/ocf >export OCF_RESKEY_= >export OCF_RESKEY_= >$OCF_ROOT/resource.d// monitor >echo $? Thanks, but I'm afraid y

Re: [Pacemaker] Monitor a resource without the cluster reacting to the result...

2009-03-25 Thread Joe Bill
>> I'd love to see something like: >> >> # crm_resource -m check_level resource_id >> .. I forgot to add that a -f option switch to cause the failover if the monitor operation failed would be cool too. ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@o