For if it helps someone, I solved by putting the rings and the drbd
connection on separate cards, 3 in total, one for each thing
Ivan
De: Ivan Coronado [mailto:icoron...@epcge.com]
Enviado el: viernes, 14 de mayo de 2010 17:25
Para: The Pacemaker cluster
Oh nop, sorry, my mistake, it doesn't works :(
Ivan
De: Ivan Coronado [mailto:icoron...@epcge.com]
Enviado el: viernes, 14 de mayo de 2010 9:02
Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Asunto: Re: [Pacemaker] two nodes fenced when drbd link
37 PM, Ivan Coronado wrote:
Hello to everybody,
I have a problem with the corosync.conf setup. I have a drbd
service runing on eth3, and a general network and the stonith device
(idrac6) in the eth0. If I unplug the eth3 to simulate a network failure
two nodes are fenced (
Hello to everybody,
I have a problem with the corosync.conf setup. I have a drbd service
runing on eth3, and a general network and the stonith device (idrac6) in
the eth0. If I unplug the eth3 to simulate a network failure two nodes
are fenced (first the slave followed by the master). If I only l
06:01:17PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Ivan Coronado
wrote:
> > And why is a better choice? How I can know?
>
> The OCF standard is better in many ways, including its support for
> parameters and the error codes it returns.
LSB class is n
And why is a better choice? How I can know?
Ivan Coronado
IT Manager
EPCGE S.A.
943 82 00 10
icoron...@epcge.com
-Mensaje original-
De: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Enviado el: viernes, 16 de abril de 2010 17:31
Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Asunto: Re
Can some one tell me where I can find information about
primitive/resource classes?
If I have to select between two plugins like lsb:postgres or
heartbeat:pgsql, how can i Know what is the better choice? In this case,
I think the better class plugin is lsb, but, in others?
thanks
Ivan
Ok, thanks for the tips!
Ivan Coronado
-Mensaje original-
De: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm]
Enviado el: miércoles, 14 de abril de 2010 12:32
Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Asunto: Re: [Pacemaker] Best stonith-action, reset or poweroff
Hi,
On Wed
I was wondering what is the better stonith-action. If I set reboot but
the node doesn't restart (damaged motherboard or not power, for example)
resources do not ever migrate. So it would be better set stonith-action
to poweroff, right?
Ivan
___
Pacema
