Re: [Pacemaker] Need help with quickstart of pacemaker on redhat

e where "property set" commands were executed printed those values, another node didn't print those properties at all. Is that how it is supposed to work? Ivan ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clus

Re: [Pacemaker] Configuring 3rd Node as Quorum Node in 2 Node Cluster

On 1/11/2012 8:28 AM, Florian Haas wrote: Another option would be to permanently run the 3rd node in standby mode. Just wondering, wouldn't the standby mode prevent that node from performing the fencing actions? Also, can it act as DC then? Thanks,

Re: [Pacemaker] OCFS2 problems when connectivity lost

On 12/21/2011 1:07 PM, Tim Serong wrote: If STONITH is configured, the non-quorate node should be killed after a failed (or timed out) stop, and the quorate node should resume behaving normally. Thank you for your help, Tim. STONITH was indeed what was missing. Works as intended now. Ivan

Re: [Pacemaker] OCFS2 problems when connectivity lost

On 12/21/2011 7:26 PM, Reid, Mike wrote: Ivan, Can you post your configuration? Do you have STONITH enabled? I ran into similar issues in our Active/Active OCFS2/DRBD until we had a functioning STONITH, fwiw. Thank you for your and Florian's reply. It is indeed what was missing. It

Re: [Pacemaker] OCFS2 problems when connectivity lost

. That's the problem. Ivan ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_fr

[Pacemaker] OCFS2 problems when connectivity lost

is not an OCFS2 mailing list, but I hope that someone here encountered this problem as well and can give us some insight on it... Thanks, Ivan [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/LucidTesting#Pacemaker.2C_drbd8_and_OCFS2_or_GFS2 ___ Pac

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker Active-Active Load Balancing Issue

Hi Nick Yes I can ping only from the same subnet, if I try to ping from a diferent subnet I can't reach the Virtual-IP. I've tested witch cidr 20 24 and 32 with the same result. I'ts strange. 2011/11/16 Nick Khamis > Are you pinging from same network ip? Are you sure cidr is 20, and not 32

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker Active-Active Load Balancing Issue

Hi there, I've changed the configuration and now it's seem I'm better, but now I've another issue Now both resources ClusterIP and Squid are running in two nodes but I can't reach ClusterIP. Then if I get down ClusterIP in secondary node I reach well the ClusterIP. Basically I can't have up 2 Cl

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker Active-Active Load Balancing Issue

Hi Andreas, Have you seen anything strange? The configuration are ok? Of course Andreas, I've tested from diferent clients. Any suggestion? Best regards Ivan.- 2011/11/16 Andreas Kurz > On 11/16/2011 10:10 AM, IVAN GARCIA wrote: > > Hi there, > > I'm configurin

[Pacemaker] Pacemaker Active-Active Load Balancing Issue

erIP-Squid inf: CLONE_ClusterIP CLONE_squid order ClusterIP-after-Squid inf: CLONE_ClusterIP CLONE_squid property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ dc-version="1.1.2-f059ec7ced7a86f18e5490b67ebf4a0b963bccfe" \ cluster-infrastructure="cman" \ expected

Re: [Pacemaker] two nodes fenced when drbd link fails

For if it helps someone, I solved by putting the rings and the drbd connection on separate cards, 3 in total, one for each thing Ivan De: Ivan Coronado [mailto:icoron...@epcge.com] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de mayo de 2010 17:25 Para: The Pacemaker cluster

Re: [Pacemaker] two nodes fenced when drbd link fails

Oh nop, sorry, my mistake, it doesn't works :( Ivan De: Ivan Coronado [mailto:icoron...@epcge.com] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de mayo de 2010 9:02 Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Asunto: Re: [Pacemaker] two nodes fenced when drbd link

Re: [Pacemaker] two nodes fenced when drbd link fails

Thanks! it's works!!! Ivan De: Vadym Chepkov [mailto:vchep...@gmail.com] Enviado el: viernes, 14 de mayo de 2010 4:03 Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Asunto: Re: [Pacemaker] two nodes fenced when drbd link fails On May 13, 2010, at 1:

[Pacemaker] two nodes fenced when drbd link fails

5406 } - Ivan ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf

Re: [Pacemaker] the better class plugin for a service?

Thanks for the answer. Ivan -Mensaje original- De: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm] Enviado el: lunes, 19 de abril de 2010 13:26 Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Asunto: Re: [Pacemaker] the better class plugin for a service? Hi, On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at

Re: [Pacemaker] the better class plugin for a service?

And why is a better choice? How I can know? Ivan Coronado IT Manager EPCGE S.A. 943 82 00 10 icoron...@epcge.com -Mensaje original- De: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net] Enviado el: viernes, 16 de abril de 2010 17:31 Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Asunto: Re

[Pacemaker] the better class plugin for a service?

Can some one tell me where I can find information about primitive/resource classes? If I have to select between two plugins like lsb:postgres or heartbeat:pgsql, how can i Know what is the better choice? In this case, I think the better class plugin is lsb, but, in others? thanks Ivan

Re: [Pacemaker] Best stonith-action, reset or poweroff

Ok, thanks for the tips! Ivan Coronado -Mensaje original- De: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm] Enviado el: miércoles, 14 de abril de 2010 12:32 Para: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Asunto: Re: [Pacemaker] Best stonith-action, reset or poweroff Hi, On Wed

[Pacemaker] Best stonith-action, reset or poweroff

I was wondering what is the better stonith-action. If I set reboot but the node doesn't restart (damaged motherboard or not power, for example) resources do not ever migrate. So it would be better set stonith-action to poweroff, right?