Thank you for the information I'll change the configuration and see
what will happen.
Hard to troubleshoot network issue.
I didn't detect any packets losts.
Running cluster on VM seems a bit tricky.
On 28 June 2012 04:42, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:55 PM
Hello,
I guess this as laready been raised but I do have the following
message on some of my clusters :
Jun 24 12:00:02 server corosync[27089]: [TOTEM ] A processor joined
or left the membership and a new membership was formed.
Jun 24 14:10:02 server corosync[27089]: [TOTEM ] A processor join
Hello,
any idea ?
Regards,
On 10 April 2012 10:34, Hugo Deprez wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I am trying to configure the ocf script ocf_heartbeat_apache.
> I disable the default site from apache conf. So the ra is not able to
> detect if the apache2 is running.
>
> I
ight ?
Regards,
Hugo
On 26 July 2011 19:27, Digimer wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 11:43 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:36:25AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
> >> On 07/20/2011 11:24 AM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
> >>> Hello Andrew,
> >>>
> >>&g
Oh sorry I didn't look at the configuration correctly, documentation is
right :
no-quorum-policy="ignore"rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \
resource-stickiness="100"
It is just specify on one line.
Sorry
Regards
Hugo
On 4 April 2012 14:58, Hugo Depr
Dear community,
I just have a look at the documentation with regards to the
resource-stickiness parameter.
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/_prevent_resources_from_moving_after_recovery.html
I am running corosync 1.2.1-4, and when I specify this param
be manage easily.
Regards,
Hugo
On 2 April 2012 17:07, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-04-02T11:34:23, Hugo Deprez wrote:
>
> > I am using a puppet mode in order to manage my cluster.
> > I get a weird thing with the start & stop of the corosync daemon.
> >
&g
Dear community,
I am using a puppet mode in order to manage my cluster.
I get a weird thing with the start & stop of the corosync daemon.
When I modify the corosync.conf file, puppet is asked to restart / reload
corosync, but it failed on the command :
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --retry fo
Hello,
I do have no-quorum-policy="ignore"
Any idea how to reproduce this ?
Regards,
On 23 February 2012 23:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Hugo Deprez
> wrote:
> > I don't think so has, I do have over similar cluster on the same networ
f the drbd-nagios resource timeout, it should failover on the other
node no ?
Regards,
On 20 February 2012 12:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Hugo Deprez
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > does anyone have an idea ?
>
> Well I see:
>
>
Hello,
No one has issue like this ?
Regards,
On 13 February 2012 11:57, Hugo Deprez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anyone have an idea ?
>
> it seems that at 13:06:38 resources et started on slave member.
> But then there is something wrong on server01 :
>
> Feb 8 1
:
nagios(lsb:nagios3):Stopped
But I don't understand what fails if this is DRBD or apache2 causes the
issue.
Any idea ?
On 10 February 2012 09:39, Hugo Deprez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please found attach to this mail the corosync logs.
> If you have any tips :)
>
>
Dear community,
I am currently running different corosync / drbd cluster using VM running
on vmware esxi host.
Guest Os are Debian Squeeze.
the active member of the cluster just freeze the VM was unreachable.
But the resources didn't achieved to move to the other node.
My cluster has the followi
Hello,
thank you for the information.
I'll go that way then.
Regards,
Hugo
On 2 November 2011 12:35, Chris Clifton wrote:
> I see, thanks!
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
>>
>> On 2011-11-01 23:11, Chris Clifton wrote:
>> > Does the bug with centos 6 still exist as fa
Dear community,
I would like to improve my configuration of my clusters.
I am thinking of using a crossover cable between my two servers for :
Corosync trafic,
DRBD trafic,
Is that the best practice ?
By using a crossover cable I'll avoid any issue on the cluster when
spanning tree change on my
Dear community,
I have a cluster with DRBD and apache2 resources.
I wanted to do some test with apache2, I knew that my test could break apache2.
Hence I did a
#crm resource unamange apache2
The resource was unmanage at the crm_mon.
When I did my test apache2 didn't restart but corosync try t
ne )
Jul 15 08:45:34 node1 kernel: [1536023.086345] block drbd0: receiver
terminated
Jul 15 08:45:34 node1 kernel: [1536023.086349] block drbd0: Terminating
receiver thread
On 19 July 2011 02:30, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Hugo Deprez
> wrote:
> >
Dear community,
I am running on Debian Lenny, a cluster with corosync. I have :
One DRBD partition and 4 resources :
fs-data(ocf::heartbeat:Filesystem):
mda-ip (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):
postfix(ocf::heartbeat:postfix):
apache (ocf::heartbeat:apache):
Last night something happens
18 matches
Mail list logo
