Re: [Pacemaker] Odd colocation behaviour with master/slave resource

2011-11-15 Thread Chris Redekop
SureI've attached a crm_report to the bug at http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5007 Thanks! On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Chris Redekop wrote: > > Andrew: It's not that the slave IP doesn't m

[Pacemaker] How to report bugs?

2011-10-25 Thread Chris Redekop
I've been wanting to report a bug for a few weeks now but the bug report site (developerbugs.linux-foundation.org) has been down for maintenance since I don't know when. Does anyone know what's up with it and if it's coming back? Has the bug reporting thinger been moved somewhere else? __

Re: [Pacemaker] Odd colocation behaviour with master/slave resource

2011-10-15 Thread Chris Redekop
: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Chris Redekop wrote: > > I'm attempting to set up a master/slave database cluster where the master > is > > R/W and the slave is R/O. The master failure scenario works fine (slave > > becomes master, master vip moves over)ho

Re: [Pacemaker] Odd colocation behaviour with master/slave resource

2011-09-06 Thread Chris Redekop
a stupid newbie question? :) On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Chris Redekop wrote: > I'm attempting to set up a master/slave database cluster where the master > is R/W and the slave is R/O. The master failure scenario works fine (slave > becomes master, master vip moves over)ho

[Pacemaker] Odd colocation behaviour with master/slave resource

2011-08-26 Thread Chris Redekop
I'm attempting to set up a master/slave database cluster where the master is R/W and the slave is R/O. The master failure scenario works fine (slave becomes master, master vip moves over)however when the slave resource goes down I want the slave vip to move to the master and then move back whe