seems this is due to resource restart rather.
>
>
> On 14/10/16 17:54, Anne Nicolas wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm having trouble with a 2 nodes cluster used for DRBD / Apache / Samba
>> and some other services.
>>
>> Whatever I do, it always goes to the foll
Le 17/10/2016 à 11:42, Kristoffer Grönlund a écrit :
> Anne Nicolas writes:
>
>> Oct 14 17:42:59 [3445] bzvairsvr attrd: warning:
>> attrd_cib_callback: Update master-drbdserv=1 failed: Transport
>> endpoint is not connected
>
> Hi Anne,
>
&
ompare()=0 by rule 40
[34318.738933] block drbd0: peer( Unknown -> Secondary ) conn(
WFReportParams -> Connected ) pdsk( DUnknown -> UpToDate )
[34328.812317] block drbd0: peer( Secondary -> Primary )
[37316.065793] usb 3-11: USB disconnect, device number 3
Le 26/11/2014 13:43, Michael Schwartzkopff a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:22:53 schrieben Sie:
Le 26/11/2014 13:07, Michael Schwartzkopff a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:54:20 schrieb Anne Nicolas:
Le 26/11/2014 12:23, Michael Schwartzkopff a écrit :
Am Mittwoch
t; you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by
> telephone or by response via mail. We have taken precautions to minimize
> the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out
> your own virus checks on this message, as well as any attachme
Le 26/11/2014 13:07, Michael Schwartzkopff a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:54:20 schrieb Anne Nicolas:
Le 26/11/2014 12:23, Michael Schwartzkopff a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:01:36 schrieb Anne Nicolas:
Hi !
I've been using clusterip for a while now withou
Le 26/11/2014 12:23, Michael Schwartzkopff a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:01:36 schrieb Anne Nicolas:
Hi !
I've been using clusterip for a while now without any problem in
Active/Passive clusters (2 nodes).
Could you please explain, how could you use the ClusterIP in an a
Hi !
I've been using clusterip for a while now without any problem in
Active/Passive clusters (2 nodes). On my last install, I'm facing quite
an annoying probem. Despite the same configuration for clusterip I've
ever used, , the interface is now up on both nodes which ends with an IP
conflict
Le 06/03/2014 10:12, Gianluca Cecchi a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Anne Nicolas wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm having trouble setting a very simple cluster with 2 nodes. After all
>> reboot I'm getting split brain that I have to solve by hand then.
&
}
common {
handlers {
fence-peer "/usr/lib/drbd/crm-fence-peer.sh";
after-resync-target "/usr/lib/drbd/crm-unfence-peer.sh";
}
syncer { rate 500M; }
}
but no improvment.
>
>
> 2014-03-05 9:28 GMT+01:00 Anne Nicolas
Hi
I'm having trouble setting a very simple cluster with 2 nodes. After all
reboot I'm getting split brain that I have to solve by hand then.
Looking for a solution for that one...
Both nodes have 4 network interfaces. We use 3 of them: one for an IP
cluster, one for a bridge for a vm and the las
11 matches
Mail list logo
