Re: [Pacemaker] DRBD with Pacemaker on CentOs 6.5

2014-11-12 Thread Sihan Goi
Hi, getenforce returns "Enforcing" ls -dZ /var/www/html returns "drwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 /var/www/html" on both nodes. Running restorecon doesn't change the ls-dZ output. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 11.11.2014 07:27, Sihan

Re: [Pacemaker] resource-discovery question

2014-11-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
12.11.2014 22:57, David Vossel wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> 12.11.2014 22:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> Hi David, all, >>> >>> I'm trying to get resource-discovery="never" working with cd7c9ab, but >>> still >>> get "Not installed" probe failures from nodes which does not have

Re: [Pacemaker] resource-discovery question

2014-11-12 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > 12.11.2014 22:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > > Hi David, all, > > > > I'm trying to get resource-discovery="never" working with cd7c9ab, but > > still > > get "Not installed" probe failures from nodes which does not have > > corresponding resource agents installed

Re: [Pacemaker] resource-discovery question

2014-11-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
12.11.2014 22:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi David, all, > > I'm trying to get resource-discovery="never" working with cd7c9ab, but still > get "Not installed" probe failures from nodes which does not have > corresponding resource agents installed. > > The only difference in my location const

[Pacemaker] resource-discovery question

2014-11-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi David, all, I'm trying to get resource-discovery="never" working with cd7c9ab, but still get "Not installed" probe failures from nodes which does not have corresponding resource agents installed. The only difference in my location constraints comparing to what is committed in #589 is that the

Re: [Pacemaker] batch-limit with many resources

2014-11-12 Thread Matthias Teege
Andrew Beekhof writes: >> On 8 Nov 2014, at 10:22 pm, Matthias Teege wrote: Hallo, >> same monitoring intervalls. Is it necessary to increase the >> batch-limit to allow pacemaker to run all monitoring scripts in >> parallel? > > Short version... it shouldn't be. > Which pacemaker version are

Re: [Pacemaker] Loosing corosync communication clusterwide

2014-11-12 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Tomasz Kontusz writes: > Hanging corosync sounds like libqb problems: trusty comes with 0.16, > which likes to hang from time to time. Try building libqb 0.17. It was already reported on Ubuntu tracker[1] Regards. Footnotes: [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libqb/+bug/1341496 -