On 10 Oct 2014, at 7:03 pm, Lax wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof writes:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10 Oct 2014, at 12:12 pm, Lax wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I ran into a time out issue while failing over from master to the peer
>>> server and I have a 2 node setup with 2 resources. Though it was working all
On 7 Oct 2014, at 6:28 pm, Daniel Dehennin wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof writes:
>
>>> Maybe not, the collocation should be sufficient, but even without the
>>> orders, unclean VMs fencing is tried with other Stonith devices.
>>
>> Which other devices? The config you sent through didnt have any
>>
On 10 Oct 2014, at 12:08 am, Errol Neal wrote:
> Hi all. I was hoping to get some help with my configuration. I'm kinda
> stuck at the moment.
>
> I've made some changes to the Raid1 RA to implement a ms style
> configuration (you can see a diff here http://pastebin.com/Q2nbF6Rg
> against t
On 11 Oct 2014, at 1:35 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian)
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 12:39 +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 8 Oct 2014, at 2:09 am, Brian J. Murrell (brian)
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Given a 2 node pacemaker-1.1.10-14.el6_5.3 cluster with nodes "node5"
>>> and "node6" I saw an "unkno
it depends on how many nodes and resources you have, whether you're using
multicast, and how often things are going to be recovered or moved in the
cluster
On 11 Oct 2014, at 12:24 am, Sahil Aggarwal
wrote:
> What is Network Bandwidth requirement in HA using pacemaker and corosync ? ?
> ?
