Re: [Pacemaker] The problem with which queue between cib and stonith-ng overflows

2014-06-02 Thread Yusuke Iida
Hi, Andrew About 15 seconds are the time taken in the whole device construction. I think that it cannot receive the message from cib during device construction since stonith-ng does not return to mainloop. Jun 2 11:34:02 vm04 stonith-ng[4891]: info: init_cib_cache_cb: Updating device list fr

Re: [Pacemaker] a question on the `ping` RA

2014-06-02 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 2 Jun 2014, at 7:05 pm, Riccardo Murri wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > thanks for your explanations. One more question: > > On 30 May 2014 02:38, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On 29 May 2014, at 9:19 pm, Riccardo Murri wrote: >> >>> - or rather does the `ping` RA trigger failure events when even

Re: [Pacemaker] The problem with which queue between cib and stonith-ng overflows

2014-06-02 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 2 Jun 2014, at 3:05 pm, Yusuke Iida wrote: > Hi, Andrew > > I use the newest of 1.1 brunches and am testing by eight sets of nodes. > > Although the problem was settled once, > Now, the problem with which queue overflows between cib and stonithd > has recurred. > > As an example, I paste t

Re: [Pacemaker] unexpected demote request on master

2014-06-02 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 2 Jun 2014, at 5:43 pm, K Mehta wrote: > Andrew, > Will you let me know if using the rule (assuming this rule works) pcs -f > $CLUSTER_CREATE_LOG constraint location vha-$uuid rule score=-INFINITY > \#uname ne vsanqa11 and \#uname ne vsanqa12 might help in resolving > unexpected demote ?

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker mount failures

2014-06-02 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:17:00PM +0100, Stuart Taylor wrote: > Hi > > I wonder if anyone on the list can help me - I’m new to Pacemaker so > apologies if I’m posting in the wrong place. > > I have a four-node cluster running Pacemaker 1.1.10 with Corosync 1.4.1 on > CentOS 6.4. Resource

Re: [Pacemaker] a question on the `ping` RA

2014-06-02 Thread Riccardo Murri
Hi Andrew, thanks for your explanations. One more question: On 30 May 2014 02:38, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On 29 May 2014, at 9:19 pm, Riccardo Murri wrote: > >> - or rather does the `ping` RA trigger failure events when even one of >> the nodes cannot be pinged? > > both. it always trigger

Re: [Pacemaker] unexpected demote request on master

2014-06-02 Thread K Mehta
Andrew, Will you let me know if using the rule (assuming this rule works) pcs -f $CLUSTER_CREATE_LOG constraint location vha-$uuid rule score=-INFINITY \#uname ne vsanqa11 and \#uname ne vsanqa12 might help in resolving unexpected demote ? Regards, Kiran On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:58 AM, K Meh