On 06/09/2013, at 1:23 AM, David Coulson wrote:
> We patched and rebooted one of our clusters this morning - I verified that
> pacemaker is the same as previous, plus it matches another similar cluster.
>
> There is a resource in the cluster defined as:
>
> primitive re-named-reload ocf:heart
We patched and rebooted one of our clusters this morning - I verified
that pacemaker is the same as previous, plus it matches another similar
cluster.
There is a resource in the cluster defined as:
primitive re-named-reload ocf:heartbeat:anything \
params binfile="/usr/sbin/rndc" cmdli
Just a quick follow up - I had this answered on the Corosync mailing list
(which I guess should have been the place for this anyway). As I was blocking
all traffic with iptables, it was also blocking lo, which caused all sorts of
things to break. As soon as I only blocked on eth0, things started
Hi Heikki,
just some comments for helping yourself.
1) The second output of crm_mon show a resource IP_database
which is not shown in the initial crm_mon output and also
not in the config. => Reduce your problem/config to the
minimum being reproducible.
2) Enable logging and look out which node
Hello,
I'm having a bit of a problem understanding what's going on with my simple
two-node demo cluster here. My resources come up correctly after restarting the
whole cluster but the LVM and Filesystem resources fail to start after a single
node restart or standby/unstandby (after node comes b
On 05/09/13 11:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 05/09/2013, at 6:37 PM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
On 03/09/13 22:03, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 03/09/2013, at 11:49 PM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
On 03/09/13 05:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 02/09/2013, at 5:27 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem whereby when I create a network split/partition (by dropping
traffic with iptables), the victim node for some reason does not realise it has
split from the network.
It seems to recognise that it can't form a cluster due to network issues, but
the status is not reflecte
On 05/09/2013, at 6:37 PM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> On 03/09/13 22:03, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 03/09/2013, at 11:49 PM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/09/13 05:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 02/09/2013, at 5:27 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
>
On 2013-09-05T12:23:23, Andreas Mock wrote:
> - resource monitoring failed on node 1
> => stop of resource on node 1 failed
> => stonith off node 1 worked
> - more or less parallel as resource is clone resource
> resource monitoring failed on node 2
> => stop of resource on node 2 failed
Hi all,
is there a way to recover from node state UNCLEAN (online) without
rebooting?
Background:
- RHEL6.4
- cman-cluster with pacemaker
- stonith enabled and working
- resource monitoring failed on node 1
=> stop of resource on node 1 failed
=> stonith off node 1 worked
- more or less pa
On 03/09/13 22:03, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 03/09/2013, at 11:49 PM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
On 03/09/13 05:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 02/09/2013, at 5:27 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
30.08.2013, 07:18, "Andrew Beekhof" :
On 29/08/2013, at 7:31 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
29.08.2
11 matches
Mail list logo
