On 26/06/2013, at 10:37 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-26T21:31:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> Distributions can take care of them when they integrate them; basically
>>> they'll trickle through until the whole stack the distributions ship
>>> builds again.
>> If we let 2.0.x be a
On 06/24/13 16:33, Mailing List SVR wrote:
Hi,
I defined this clone resource for connectivity check:
pcs resource create ping ocf:pacemaker:ping host_list="10.0.2.2"
multiplier="1000" dampen=10s op monitor interval=60s
pcs resource clone ping ping_clone globally-unique=false
these works, but
This question appears to be the same issue asked here:
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-June/018650.html
In my case, I have two fence methods per node; IPMI first with
action="reboot" and, if that fails, two PDUs (one backing each side of
the node's redundant PSUs).
Initially
thanks four your answer.
but still question open.
when i switch off the active node: though this is done reliable for me, the
still passive node wants to know for sure and will kill the (already dead)
former active node.
i have no stonith-hardware (and i could not find till now stonith:null what
w
Hi Jake,
Thank you for the info. I was using OCF. Lsb worked.
R,
CB
-Original Message-
From: Jake Smith [mailto:jsm...@argotec.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:08 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker error trying to add Apache resource
Hi,
I did not trigger file system corruptions again. So, at this moment it
looks like it is important to:
- turn caching off
- use native aio
- *and* use an up-to-date machine type
Failure to meet any of these criteria would result in fs corruption.
Does this make sense at all?
Later part is
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:53:17 -0400 (EDT)
Jake Smith wrote:
> If you wanted you could set location constraints preventing test4
> and/or clone node max so you don't have stopped status in the clone
> sets for node test4.
Hi Jake,
at the moment I'm not sure if we're going to use ocfs at all on th
Hi!
Fencing is disabled for now, the issue is not with fencing: the question is
- why only one out of three DRBD master-slave sets is recognized by
pacemaker, even though all three drbd resources are active and configured
properly...
2013/6/26 Digimer
> I don't see fencing/stonith configured.
- Original Message -
> From: "Colin Blair"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:56:49 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker error trying to add Apache resource
>
> All,
> Couldn't find a solution in the forum. Configuration info:
>
> Ubuntu
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:33:30 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > When you run ./autogen.sh it tries to start an rpm command, this
> > failed because I didn't had rpm installed.
>
> How did it fail?
> That whole block if intended to be skipped if rpm isn't available.
>
> if [ -e `which rpm` ];
- Original Message -
> From: "Denis Witt"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Cc: "jsmith"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 8:35:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] ERROR: Wrong stack o2cb
>
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:53:37 -0400 (EDT)
> jsmith wrote:
>
> > You could start ocfs2 in the c
You have a few issues here.
First up, a node can *never* be expected to self-fence. You can
intentionally crash a node to see why this is a bad idea; 'echo c >
/proc/sysrq-trigger' (this will immediately crash a node!). You need to
make sure each node can reach the *other* node's iLO interface.
N
I don't see fencing/stonith configured. Without it, your cluster will
not be stable. You will get DRBD split-brains easily and depending in
what you use DRBD for, you could corrupt your data.
On 06/25/2013 09:25 AM, Саша Александров wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I am setting up a new cluster on OracleLinu
All,
Couldn't find a solution in the forum. Configuration info:
Ubuntu 12.04 Server
Corosync 1.4.2 cman plugin
Pacemaker 1.1.6
Apache 2.2.22
I have an active/passive 2-node cluster running.
I am receiving the following error when adding the web-server resource:
Failed actions:
web-server_start_
Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2013, 16:36:43 schrieb andreas graeper:
> hi and thanks.
> a primitive can be moved to another node. how can i move (change roles) of
> drbd:master to the other node ?
Switch off the other node.
> and will all the depending resources follow?
Depends on your constraints(ord
hi and thanks.
a primitive can be moved to another node. how can i move (change roles) of
drbd:master to the other node ? and will all the depending resources follow
?
then i can stop (and start again) corosync on passive node without problem
(my tiny experience).
another question: i found a locat
Dear Pacemaker community!
We are almost completed our evaluation of Pacemaker + Corosync
+ Cman
We think it is great HA framework!
Also, great support from the community!
Thank you for this!
We think that the following features will help for the easier integration
of Pacemaker with complex s
Any ideas? :-(
2013/6/25 Саша Александров
> Hi all!
>
> I am setting up a new cluster on OracleLinux 6.4 (well, it is CentOS 6.4).
> I went through http://clusterlabs.org/quickstart-redhat.html
> Then I installed DRBD 8.4.2 from elrepo.
> This setup is unusable :-( with DRBD 8.4.2.
> I created
On 2013-06-26T21:31:14, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Distributions can take care of them when they integrate them; basically
> > they'll trickle through until the whole stack the distributions ship
> > builds again.
> If we let 2.0.x be anything like 1.1.x, I suspect this would be rather
> difficul
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 07:53:37 -0400 (EDT)
jsmith wrote:
> You could start ocfs2 in the cluster just disable/remove the
> filesystem resource for now. Once pacemaker has started ocfs2 I
> believe you can do what you need?
Hi Jake,
Node test4: standby
Online: [ test4-node1 test4-node2 ]
Master/
Situation:
Two HP DL380 G7 (with ILO3) servers running pacemaker and heartbeat
(yes, I know it's deprecated but I haven't got round to using
corosync yet) on RHEL 6.4 (NOT using the Red Hat Cluster suite). The
servers are in different data centres.
node-a no
Original message
From: Denis Witt
Date: 06/26/2013 6:46 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] ERROR: Wrong stack o2cb
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:07:05 +0200
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> This indicates you have a 'wrong stack' o
On 26/06/2013, at 7:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-25T20:28:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps a numbering scheme like the Linux kernel would fit better than a
>>> stable/unstable branch distinction. Changes that deserve the "unstable"
>>> term are really really rare (and I
On 26/06/2013, at 12:24 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 07:29 AM, andreas graeper wrote:
>> hi,
>> maybe again and again the same question, please excuse.
>>
>> two nodes (n1 active / n2 passive) and `service corosync stop` on active.
>> does the node, that is going down, tells the other tha
On 26/06/2013, at 6:51 PM, Denis Witt
wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:35:33 +1000
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> System is Debian Wheezy which means version 0.11.1-2 for libqb-dev.
>
>> rpm errors on debian?
>> I'm confused.
>
> When you run ./autogen.sh it tries to start an rpm command, thi
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:07:05 +0200
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> This indicates you have a 'wrong stack' on disk still. You need to run
> mkfs.ocfs2/tunefs.ocfs while the o2cb cluster resource is running, or
> to set it to "pcmk" manually.
Hi Lars,
at the moment I assume I have a user-Stack on
di
26.06.2013 12:07, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-25T12:03:22, Colin Blair wrote:
>
>> Andrew,
>>
>> Does Pacemaker support GPU processes?
>
> Pacemaker is not very CPU intensive; what would it use a GPU for?
Finding strict optimal solution for utilization-based placement would be
suitab
On 2013-06-25T20:28:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Perhaps a numbering scheme like the Linux kernel would fit better than a
> > stable/unstable branch distinction. Changes that deserve the "unstable"
> > term are really really rare (and I'm sure we've all learned from them),
> > so it may be bette
On 2013-06-25T12:03:22, Colin Blair wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Does Pacemaker support GPU processes?
Pacemaker is not very CPU intensive; what would it use a GPU for?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (
On 2013-06-25T17:08:36, Denis Witt wrote:
> My cluster.conf (I added this later to be able to run tunefs.ocfs
> --update-cluster-stack):
This indicates you have a 'wrong stack' on disk still. You need to run
mkfs.ocfs2/tunefs.ocfs while the o2cb cluster resource is running, or to
set it to "pcmk
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:38:37 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> trace Jun 25 13:40:10 gio_read_socket(366):0: 0xa6c140.4 1
> >> (ref=1) trace Jun 25 13:40:10 lrmd_ipc_accept(89):0: Connection
> >> 0xa6d110 infoJun 25 13:40:10 crm_client_new(276):0: Connecting
> >> 0xa6d110 for uid=17 gid=0 p
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:35:33 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > System is Debian Wheezy which means version 0.11.1-2 for libqb-dev.
> rpm errors on debian?
> I'm confused.
When you run ./autogen.sh it tries to start an rpm command, this failed
because I didn't had rpm installed. Anyway, I don't t
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:34:30 -0400 (EDT)
Jake Smith wrote:
> I'm guessing if you run:
> grep user /sys/fs/ocfs2/loaded_cluster_plugins 2>&1; rc=$?
> your going to return a 1 or something other than 0.
Hi Jake,
true, as long as ocfs2_stack_user isn't loaded. I loaded it and now the
command ret
Sent from a mobile device
On 26/06/2013, at 5:44 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:35:03 +1000
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Urgh:
>>
>> infoJun 25 13:40:10 lrmd_ipc_connect(913):0: Connecting to lrmd
>> trace Jun 25 13:40:10 pick_ipc_buffer(670):0: Using max message
>>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:35:03 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Urgh:
>
> infoJun 25 13:40:10 lrmd_ipc_connect(913):0: Connecting to lrmd
> trace Jun 25 13:40:10 pick_ipc_buffer(670):0: Using max message
> size of 51200 error Jun 25 13:40:10
> qb_sys_mmap_file_open(92):2147483648: couldn't ope
(in addition)
n1 (former active/master node) is still stopped
n2 : corosync stop + start
now drbd is slave on n2 and nothing else starts
there is a location-constraint
Master, -INF uname __ne__ lisel1
i would interprete :
master must not start where ?node-nam
36 matches
Mail list logo
