On 25/06/2013, at 4:34 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:10:13 +1000
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 24/06/2013, at 9:31 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> After I have upgraded Pacemaker from 1.1.8 to 1.1.9 on a node I get
>>> the following errors in my syslog and Pacemak
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:10:13 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 24/06/2013, at 9:31 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>
> >
> > After I have upgraded Pacemaker from 1.1.8 to 1.1.9 on a node I get
> > the following errors in my syslog and Pacemaker doesn't seem to be
> > able to start services on this no
25.06.2013, 09:49, "Andrew Beekhof" :
> On 25/06/2013, at 2:33 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>> 25.06.2013, 04:46, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>>> On 24/06/2013, at 3:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1]
On 25/06/2013, at 2:33 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 25.06.2013, 04:46, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 24/06/2013, at 3:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the
final rel
22.06.2013, 21:32, "Lars Marowsky-Bree" :
> On 2013-06-21T14:30:42, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>> I was wrong - the resource starts in 15 minutes.
>> I found a matching entry in the log at the same time:
>> grep '11:59.*900' /var/log/cluster/corosync.log
>> Jun 21 11:59:50 [23616] dev-cluster2
25.06.2013, 04:46, "Andrew Beekhof" :
> On 24/06/2013, at 3:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the
>>> final release.
>> Is it going to be 1.1.10 or 1.2.0 (2.0.0)?
>
> First i
On 25/06/2013, at 1:20 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> 2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
>>
>> On 25/06/2013, at 12:12 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>
>>> 2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> 2013/6/24 Andrew Beekho
On 24/06/2013, at 7:45 PM, Michael Furman wrote:
> > What kind of status?
>
>
> We want to run one command that will return the status of the node in one
> value: online or offline (or standby).
>
> Please find attached 3 core files.
I can't read the core files. They're specific to your m
2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 25/06/2013, at 12:12 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
>>>
>>> On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>>
Hi Andrew
2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>
On 24/06/2013, at 7:45 PM, Michael Furman wrote:
> > What kind of status?
>
>
> We want to run one command that will return the status of the node in one
> value: online or offline (or standby).
That could reasonably be added to crm_node.
___
Pa
On 25/06/2013, at 12:12 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> 2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
>>
>> On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> 2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof :
On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> I r
2013/6/25 Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> 2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof :
>>>
>>> On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>>
Hi Andrew
I received similar error using 6ea4b7e(HEAD) under RHEL6.
-
On 24/06/2013, at 8:37 PM, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> crm_mon -rA1 shows :
>
> ClusterIP(ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):Started lisel1
> Master/Slave Set: ms_drbd_r0 [p_drbd_r0]
> Masters: [ lisel1 ]
> Slaves: [ lisel2 ]
> p_lvm_r0(ocf::heartbeat:LVM):Started lisel1
>
On 24/06/2013, at 8:55 PM, Munehiro SATO wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can resource agents know the cause of stop action?
Not really, no.
>
> I want to know following situations in RA for my application(it's
> Master/Slave resource).
>
> * stop by "crm resource stop"
> In this case, my application
On 24/06/2013, at 3:03 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> 2013/6/24 Andrew Beekhof :
>>
>> On 24/06/2013, at 12:46 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> I received similar error using 6ea4b7e(HEAD) under RHEL6.
>>> -
>>> # export WITH='--without cman --withou
On 24/06/2013, at 3:44 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 24.06.2013 04:17, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Either people have given up on testing, or rc5[1] is looking good for the
>> final release.
>
> Is it going to be 1.1.10 or 1.2.0 (2.0.0)?
First its going to be 1.1.10 and, if there is still no-o
On 22/06/2013, at 5:31 AM, Denis Witt wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> might be offtopic but I'm sure there are may People on this List who had
> answered this question for themselfs.
>
> I have a MySQL Master/Master/Slave setup which is rather unreliable, so i'm
> asking myself if it might be better
On 24/06/2013, at 9:31 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>
> After I have upgraded Pacemaker from 1.1.8 to 1.1.9 on a node I get the
> following errors
> in my syslog and Pacemaker doesn't seem to be able to start services on this
> node.
What else did you upgrade? libqb too?
>
> Jun 24 13:19:44
Hi,
I defined this clone resource for connectivity check:
pcs resource create ping ocf:pacemaker:ping host_list="10.0.2.2"
multiplier="1000" dampen=10s op monitor interval=60s
pcs resource clone ping ping_clone globally-unique=false
these works, but now I need to add a location rules to make
After I have upgraded Pacemaker from 1.1.8 to 1.1.9 on a node I get the
following errors
in my syslog and Pacemaker doesn't seem to be able to start services on this
node.
Jun 24 13:19:44 dev1n2 crmd[5994]:error: qb_sys_mmap_file_open: couldn't
open file /dev/shm/qb-lrmd-request-5991-5994-
24.06.2013 13:55, Munehiro SATO wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can resource agents know the cause of stop action?
>
> I want to know following situations in RA for my application(it's
> Master/Slave resource).
>
> * stop by "crm resource stop"
>In this case, my application shutdowns normally in stop
Hi all,
Can resource agents know the cause of stop action?
I want to know following situations in RA for my application(it's
Master/Slave resource).
* stop by "crm resource stop"
In this case, my application shutdowns normally in stop action of RA.
* stop by failure
In this case, my app
hi,
crm_mon -rA1 shows :
ClusterIP(ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):Started lisel1
Master/Slave Set: ms_drbd_r0 [p_drbd_r0]
Masters: [ lisel1 ]
Slaves: [ lisel2 ]
p_lvm_r0(ocf::heartbeat:LVM):Started lisel1
workFS(ocf::heartbeat:Filesystem):Started lisel1
p_samba(l
On 24/06/2013, at 6:29 PM, Michael Furman wrote:
> Andrew,
> I have send the core files attached to mail from Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013
> 13:18:04 +0300. Unfortunately the mail server did not sent it.
> Can you look on the mail server?
100s of spam messages but nothing from you.
Please send them
Hello, I read a post on corosync 1.3.1:
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2011-May/010517.html
"We have recently
with corosync 1.3.1 gone through an alignment fixing process for ARM
arches"
Is this avaiable as a download, as I have download
Hi List,
might be offtopic but I'm sure there are may People on this List who had
answered this question for themselfs.
I have a MySQL Master/Master/Slave setup which is rather unreliable, so i'm
asking myself if it might be better to use DRBD to keep the databases in Sync.
Is this a resona
Andrew,
I have send the core files attached to mail from Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013
13:18:04 +0300. Unfortunately the mail server did not sent it.
Can you look on the mail server?
May be you miss my additional question:
Is it possible in Pacemaker to run one command and get the status of the node
22.06.2013 16:37, Sven Arnold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting closer... Some updates for those who are interested.
>
Did you turn caching off for your VMs disks?
>>>
>>> That's a point. Indeed caching was not explicitely turned off and I just
>>> noticed that the default setting of the cache a
28 matches
Mail list logo
