On 23/05/2013, at 12:33 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Please keep the bug reports coming in. There is a good chances that
> this will be the final release candidate and 1.1.10 will be tagged on
> May 30th.
I am delaying rc4 until we can get definitive closure on the crmd memory
leak(s).
Valgrin
Am 05.06.2013 um 04:04 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
But no resources are started, so I suspect there really is quorum.
>>>
>>> Can you send me the output of cibadmin -Ql please?
>>> Perhaps those two resources are blocked for other reasons.
>
> It looks like you may have hit a bug in an older
On 05/06/2013, at 12:15 PM, Denis Witt
wrote:
>
> Am 05.06.2013 um 04:04 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
> But no resources are started, so I suspect there really is quorum.
Can you send me the output of cibadmin -Ql please?
Perhaps those two resources are blocked for other rea
On 05/06/2013, at 11:55 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
>
> Am 05.06.2013 um 03:34 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
>>> But no resources are started, so I suspect there really is quorum.
>>
>> Can you send me the output of cibadmin -Ql please?
>> Perhaps those two resources are blocked for other reasons.
I
Am 05.06.2013 um 03:34 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>> But no resources are started, so I suspect there really is quorum.
>
> Can you send me the output of cibadmin -Ql please?
> Perhaps those two resources are blocked for other reasons.
Hi Andrew,
here we go:
On 05/06/2013, at 10:43 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
>
> Am 05.06.2013 um 02:15 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
>>> Jun 5 01:11:06 test4 pengine: [18625]: WARN: cluster_status: We do not
>>> have quorum - fencing and resource management disabled
>>> Jun 5 01:11:06 test4 pengine: [18625]: notice: LogAc
Am 05.06.2013 um 02:15 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>> Jun 5 01:11:06 test4 pengine: [18625]: WARN: cluster_status: We do not have
>> quorum - fencing and resource management disabled
>> Jun 5 01:11:06 test4 pengine: [18625]: notice: LogActions: Start
>> pingtest:0#011(test4 - blocked)
>> Jun
On 05/06/2013, at 9:22 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
>
> Am 05.06.2013 um 00:52 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>
>>> been restored the resources aren't restarted. Running crm_resource -P
>>> brings anything up, but of course it would be nice if this happens
>>> automatically. Is there any way to archive th
Hi Andrew,
> Yep, sounds like a problem.
> I'll follow up on bugzilla
All right!
Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Tue, 2013/6/4, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 04/06/2013, at 3:00 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
> >
> > It is right movement that recognize other nodes in a UNCLEAN
Am 05.06.2013 um 00:52 schrieb Andrew Beekhof :
>> been restored the resources aren't restarted. Running crm_resource -P
>> brings anything up, but of course it would be nice if this happens
>> automatically. Is there any way to archive this?
>
> It should happen automatically.
> Logs?
Hi Andre
On 04/06/2013, at 11:35 PM, Weihua JIANG wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want a typical active/passive mode HA solution.
>
> My Pacemaker configuration as below:
> 3 Nodes:
> node Lezbxh0jl
> node Ljn74rici
> node L472nxxdy (standby)
> The 3rd node L472nxxdy is only used for quorum election. So, I forc
On 05/06/2013, at 2:13 AM, Denis Witt
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have a cluster with two nodes running services, to make the Cluster
> more reliable I added a third node with no services (I didn't start
> pacemaker there, only corosync). I can't use STONITH in my setup so I
> choose no-quorum-pol
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 07:15:11PM +0200, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> i tried, before starting dovecot+exim+fetchmail
>
> to create a symlink
> /var/mail -> /mnt/mirror/var/mail
> with ra ocf:heartbeat:symlink
>
> i changed target :
> chmod 0775
> chown root.mail
>
> but i need write perm
hi,
i tried, before starting dovecot+exim+fetchmail
to create a symlink
/var/mail -> /mnt/mirror/var/mail
with ra ocf:heartbeat:symlink
i changed target :
chmod 0775
chown root.mail
but i need write permission to /var/mail
cause exim wants to create a lock file
i tried to manually
chown -h
Hi List,
I have a cluster with two nodes running services, to make the Cluster
more reliable I added a third node with no services (I didn't start
pacemaker there, only corosync). I can't use STONITH in my setup so I
choose no-quorum-policy=stop to avoid data corruption on my
DRBD-Resources. The s
Hi,
Adding a timeout for the stop() operation worked like a charm.
Thanks for the input!
gr.
Johan
On 30-05-13 14:20, Florian Crouzat wrote:
Le 30/05/2013 13:57, Johan Huysmans a écrit :
When my resource has received the stop command, it will stop, but this
takes some time.
When the status
Hello Denis
I'm glad you solved
2013/6/4 Denis Witt
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:38:57 +0200
> Denis Witt wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to setup a Apache/DRBD cluster, but the Filesystem isn't
> > mounted. crm status always tells me "not installed" as status for the
> > filesystem primitive. Mounting th
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:38:57 +0200
Denis Witt wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a Apache/DRBD cluster, but the Filesystem isn't
> mounted. crm status always tells me "not installed" as status for the
> filesystem primitive. Mounting the filesystem by hand works fine.
Hi List,
I got it fixed. fuser wa
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:48:28 +0200
emmanuel segura wrote:
> Did you tried to mount the filesystem manualy, without the cluster?
Hi Emmanuel,
yes, I did, works fine.
Best regards
Denis Witt
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
htt
Le 04/06/2013 11:55, andreas graeper a écrit :
but pacemaker should realize that lsb:xxx did not start ?!
what is to do ? maybe the init scripts return is not correct ?!
Check your init-script against lsb compliance:
http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-crmsh/html/Pacemaker_Explained
Le 04/06/2013 06:44, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit :
but I am looking for info on the
op start
op monito
op stop
where can I find that. Googling show these in examples but doesn't explain them.
Operations are not tied to a resource agent but are generic: start,
stop, monitor, and eventual
Hello Denis
Did you tried to mount the filesystem manualy, without the cluster?
Thanks
2013/6/4 Denis Witt
> Hi List,
>
> I'm trying to setup a Apache/DRBD cluster, but the Filesystem isn't
> mounted. crm status always tells me "not installed" as status for the
> filesystem primitive. Mountin
Hi List,
I'm trying to setup a Apache/DRBD cluster, but the Filesystem isn't
mounted. crm status always tells me "not installed" as status for the
filesystem primitive. Mounting the filesystem by hand works fine.
Here is my config:
root@test3:~# crm configure show
node test3
node test4
primitive
Hi all,
I want a typical active/passive mode HA solution.
My Pacemaker configuration as below:
3 Nodes:
node Lezbxh0jl
node Ljn74rici
node L472nxxdy (standby)
The 3rd node L472nxxdy is only used for quorum election. So, I forced it to
enter standby mode to avoid resource migrated to it.
The reso
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 12:00:25 schrieb andreas graeper:
> hi,
> target-system are identical machines with centos, but i am playing on
> debian-lubuntu to learn/test.
> debian: nfs-common + nfs-kernel-server
> ubuntu: nfs
>
> is there a way to handle such differences. or is it simply a bad ide
2013/6/4 Andrew Beekhof :
>
> On 03/06/2013, at 8:55 PM, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I run the test after we updated pacemaker.
>>
>> I tested the same way as the previous test. However, I think that the
>> memory leak still may be caused.
>>
>> I attached the result(smaps and crm_mon and e
hi,
target-system are identical machines with centos, but i am playing on
debian-lubuntu to learn/test.
debian: nfs-common + nfs-kernel-server
ubuntu: nfs
is there a way to handle such differences. or is it simply a bad idea to
connect different systems.
thanks in advance
andreas
hi,
i am on debian7. nfs-kernel-server is not started cause there are no exports
pacemaker does not realize this, tells nfs-common and nfs-kernel-server are
started, but ocf:heartbeat:exportfs monitor is in fault-list.
i changed nfs-kernel-server init script: if there is /etc/exports.d/force
then
On 04/06/2013, at 3:00 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
> It is right movement that recognize other nodes in a UNCLEAN state in the
> node that rebooted, but seems to recognize it by mistake.
>
> It is like the problem of Pacemaker somehow or other.
> * There seems to be the problem wit
29 matches
Mail list logo
