Hahaha. Digmer you know you're a total advocate of RH and RH based
products ;).
Lars, I remember the amazing support SE had for AIS even going back to
1.1.x. If I recall correctly I used some of the patches written by
you? To get OCFS2 dlm and configfs running with pacemaker+cman hybrid
cluster
Try this patch.
https://github.com/davidvossel/pacemaker/commit/56efa1274de0d6832730dcce9852c61b9bab9a1e
-- Vossel
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://ww
On 05/24/2013 01:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-24T12:15:04, Digimer wrote:
Nope. Until RHEL 5, openais was the communication layer of the cluster.
However, the full AIS API was deemed "overkill" for what HA clustering
needed, so corosync was created for RHEL 6 as a stripped-down,
- Original Message -
> From: "David Vossel"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:21:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker-remote tls handshaking
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Lindsay Todd"
> > To: "The Pacemaker cluster reso
On 2013-05-24T12:15:04, Digimer wrote:
> Nope. Until RHEL 5, openais was the communication layer of the cluster.
> However, the full AIS API was deemed "overkill" for what HA clustering
> needed, so corosync was created for RHEL 6 as a stripped-down, HA focused
> version of openais. In turn, open
On 2013-05-24T09:36:21, Nick Khamis wrote:
> include them here if you can Florian, can we do an active/active OCFS2 +
> fs/dlm without
> the cman pleasantries.
If you're looking for OCFS2, that works just fine on SLE HA. And it is
very stable.
It's not yet working on the most recent corosync 2.
On 05/24/2013 11:24 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Was there not a time where corosync was a subset of OpenAIS? Namely,
openais support for active/active and passive/active? I might have my
channels mixed up, it's been a while
@#linux-cluster and #linux-ha: Will do.
Ninus Khamis (PhD)
PS Sorry for
Was there not a time where corosync was a subset of OpenAIS? Namely,
openais support for active/active and passive/active? I might have my
channels mixed up, it's been a while
@#linux-cluster and #linux-ha: Will do.
Ninus Khamis (PhD)
PS Sorry for the hijack
On 05/24/2013 10:52 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Digmer,
It's been a while since i've visited your well written how-to blogs
however, can you direct me to your latest and greatest active/active
tutorials. I know you like cman, but I can just skip those parts for
and OpenAIS + Pacemaker setup.
If you
Digmer,
It's been a while since i've visited your well written how-to blogs
however, can you direct me to your latest and greatest active/active
tutorials. I know you like cman, but I can just skip those parts for
and OpenAIS + Pacemaker setup.
If you have an OpenAIS + Pacemaker tutorial, that wo
On 05/24/2013 08:26 AM, Florian Crouzat wrote:
Le 24/05/2013 04:15, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Florian Crouzat [mailto:gen...@floriancrouzat.net]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013 6:27 PM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] newbie ques
Le 24/05/2013 15:36, Nick Khamis a écrit :
We are looking to put something together but
don't wan't to use cman for certain things and pacemaker for other. This
will be strictly and active/active using OpenAIS and pacemaker. Has that
been decoupled, stable and sorted out?
I don't have the sli
+1 for quorum in 2 node = pointless. Sorry to chime in here however, I
could not help the "noob question" subject line since
I have a kind of noob question myself.
Have not setup a OpenAIS + pacemaker/corosync environment for a while. I
was wondering with the latest versions, and please
include th
Le 24/05/2013 04:15, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Florian Crouzat [mailto:gen...@floriancrouzat.net]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013 6:27 PM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] newbie question(s)
[snip]
You could also wait for a fai
Hi,
2013/5/24 Andrew Beekhof :
> Any help figuring out where the leaks might be would be very much appreciated
> :)
>
> Also, the measurements are in pages... could you run "getconf PAGESIZE" and
> let us know the result?
> I'm guessing 4096 bytes.
I got getconf.
# getconf PAGESIZE
4096
Since
(13.05.24 13:38), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 24/05/2013, at 2:19 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 23/05/2013, at 4:44 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c3486a4a8d. the latest devel).
After fencing caused by split-brain failed 11 times, S_POLICY_ENGINE state is
kept even i
Hi Andrew,
> > To Andrew :
> > If you make a patch removing a block of the file handling of pengine, I
> > confirm the movement.
> > If a problem is evaded without using tmpfs, many users welcome it.
> >
>
> You mean this patch? https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/c7e10c6
> Or another
Andrew,
How should this be done?
Just removing 'op monitor interval="15" timeout="20"' from the
resource primitive?
24.05.2013 07:29, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
A better approach would have been to disable the recurring monitor - then the
Hi Andrew,
Did you set is-managed=false for the group or a resource in the group?
I'm assuming the latter - basically the cluster noticed your resource was not running anymore.
While it did not try and do anything to fix that resource, it did stop anything that neede
On 24/05/2013, at 4:35 PM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>
>
> 24.05.2013, 01:39, "Andrew Beekhof" :
>> On 24/05/2013, at 3:49 AM, Andrey Groshev wrote:
>>
>>> 23.05.2013, 02:51, "Andrew Beekhof" :
On 22/05/2013, at 10:25 PM, Groshev Andrey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try build cl
On 24/05/2013, at 2:58 PM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Hi Vladislav,
>
>> We test movement when we located pe file in tmpfs repeatedly.
>> It seems to move well for the moment.
>
> I only adopted tmpfs, and the I/O block of pengine was improved.
> I confirm the synchronizat
21 matches
Mail list logo
