Am Freitag, 26. April 2013, 22:14:59 schrieb Michael Schwartzkopff:
> Hi,
>
> I picked up my old idea to make resouce utilizations dymanic and wrote the
> little patch for VirtualDomain to check CPU utilization every time the
> VirtualDomain is monitored:
>
> --- /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat
On 01/05/13 06:12, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 28/04/2013, at 9:19 PM, Oriol Mula-Valls wrote:
Hi,
I have modified the previous configuration to use sbd fencing. I have also
fixed several other issues with the configuration and now when the node reboots
seems not to be able to rejoin the clus
On 10/04/2013, at 8:03 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 10/04/2013, at 4:33 AM, Felix Zachlod wrote:
>
>>> It seems no rule has been selected here and it has fallen back to the
>> default.
>>> It looks similar on the other node- but some times it seems that the
>> script is
>>> being called w
On 01/05/2013, at 11:36 PM, Xavier Lashmar wrote:
> I'm not sure if anyone has run into this issue but I can't seem to find a
> debuginfo package for one of the libraries for CentOS 6.3 with Kernel
> 2.6.32-279.9.1el6.x86_64 : libtool-ltdl
>
> Here's what I get so far from the core dump, but
On 02/05/2013, at 8:21 AM, Andrew Martin wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Robert Parsons"
>> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 4:03:46 PM
>> Subject: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/Corosync on Ubuntu 12.04
>>
>>
>>
>> We're wanting to build a
On 01/05/2013, at 11:55 PM, Babu Challa wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for the replay. Now I have managed to reproduce the issue. I am
> enclosing details here for pacemaker team for their understanding .
> Requesting their advice for resolving this issue
Update your software.
>
> Hello P
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Parsons"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 4:03:46 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/Corosync on Ubuntu 12.04
>
>
>
> We're wanting to build a web server farm with approx 18 nodes. We're
> aware of scala
We're wanting to build a web server farm with approx 18 nodes. We're
aware of scalability issues with Corosync/Pacemaker but we're also told
that it is getting better with newer versions of the software. Ubuntu
12.04 is packaged with corosync 1.4.2 and pacemaker 1.1.6. I imagine
that we'll
- Original Message -
> From: "Andreas Hofmeister"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 8:14:20 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Pcmk migration logic and Libvirt migration behavior
>
> Dear All,
>
> we currently investigate a problem where some Libvirt/KVM VM in a
I'm not sure if anyone has run into this issue but I can't seem to find a
debuginfo package for one of the libraries for CentOS 6.3 with Kernel
2.6.32-279.9.1el6.x86_64 : libtool-ltdl
Here's what I get so far from the core dump, but I think it's incomplete:
...
...
...
Reading symbols from /lib
Dear All,
we currently investigate a problem where some Libvirt/KVM VM in a
pacemaker cluster ends up running on two nodes after being migrated.
The problem is triggered when a constraint is inserted that causes the
VM to be migrated away from its current node, but then the constraint is
rem
11 matches
Mail list logo
