Hi
pacemaker-1.1.8-7.el6.x86_64
corosync-1.4.3-26.2.x86_64
we are trying to just set it up we have not actually moved to productoin
yet.
I am not able to start pacemaker also.
Thanks,
PRA
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 08:59 AM, Perl Pra wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>
- Original Message -
> It wasn't as bad as I thought.
Famous last words.
running crm_mon (from pacemaker-1.1.7) reporting libcoroipcc.so.4 missing
(existed in the libcorosync4 days from corosync-1.4.2)
Found cluster-3.2.0 from http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/cluster.git which
appear
On 10/04/2013, at 11:34 AM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> sorry for the confusion again...
>
> case 5 is for Corosync.
>
> * Heartbeat
> Hostname is always converted into lower case.
> http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/file/add12b838ef4/heartbeat/heartbeat.c#l576
>
> hostname(LOWER) command(LOWER) -> OK
> ho
On 11/04/2013, at 6:33 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On 13-02-21 07:48 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Brian J. Murrell
>> wrote:
>>> I wonder what happens in the case of two racing "crm" commands that want
>>> to update the CIB (with non-overlapping/conflicting d
Hi,
[I did go through the mail thread titled: "RHEL6 and clones: CMAN needed
anyway?", but was not sure about some answers there]
I recently moved from pacemaker 1.1.7 to 1.1.8-7 on centos 6.2. I see the
following in syslog:
corosync[2966]: [pcmk ] ERROR: process_ais_conf: You have configured
On 2013-04-10T16:33:48, "Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
> > crmsh uses a read+modify+replace cycle, if B reads after A has read
> > but before the replace has happened, data will be lost.
> Does crm_resource suffer from this problem or does it properly only send
> exactly the update to the CIB for the
On 13-02-21 07:48 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Brian J. Murrell
> wrote:
>> I wonder what happens in the case of two racing "crm" commands that want
>> to update the CIB (with non-overlapping/conflicting data). Is there any
>> locking to ensure that one crm cannot
Hello Rainer,
> Hi Felix,
> maybe my hint is worthless, but have you implemented the crm_master calls
> in your RA ?
I had not. And that was it - so simple :-)
Thanks
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.or
Hi Felix,
maybe my hint is worthless, but have you implemented the crm_master calls in your RA ?
See Stateful RA demo $CRM_MASTER calls.
Rainer
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2013 um 09:58 Uhr
Von: "Felix Zachlod"
An: "'The Pacemaker cluster resource manager'"
Betreff: [Pacemaker] Master Slav
On 04/10/2013 08:59 AM, Perl Pra wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to run a service on cluster in production. I wnat to
explore pacemaker. Is this production class yet?
The resources is not transfeering to other nodes in cluster if I stop
the corosync two or three times.
Is there any stable pacemaker
On 04/10/2013 10:37 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 04/10/2013 08:59 AM, Perl Pra wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to run a service on cluster in production. I wnat to
explore pacemaker. Is this production class yet?
The resources is not transfeering to other nodes in cluster if I stop
the corosync two or thr
Hi All,
I am trying to run a service on cluster in production. I wnat to explore
pacemaker. Is this production class yet?
The resources is not transfeering to other nodes in cluster if I stop the
corosync two or three times.
Is there any stable pacemaker version?
Thanks in advance
-PRA
__
Hi,
I've set up 3-node cluster (2 active nodes + 1 standby for quorum),
cman+pacemaker
Resources - "cxml-clone" gfs2 filesystem (cloned, run on both nodes) and
"testVM" via heartbeat:VirtualDomain (domain xml located on gfs2 fs,
cLVM disk backend), set up constraints: "cxml-clone" started firs
Hi,
I hope I've got the right list, I'm still a little confused about where
CMAN ends and Pacemaker begins! We're using Pacemaker and CMAN on Oracle
6.3 to try and create an active/standby failover pair, but seem to have
some annoying conditions that are making this tricky.
We hae 2 nodes, vfonto
Hello!
I have another problem with my resource agent which should run in a master
slave fashion.
I successfully tested the RA with ocf-tester and it completes any promote or
demote action:
fctarget[14659]: DEBUG: Resource is running
fctarget[14659]: DEBUG: Resource is currently running as Slave
f
Hi All,
We confirmed the phenomenon that an error generated to be behind with a stop of
pingd.
The problem seems to be to be behind with receiving of SIGTERM of pingd until
stand_alone_ping processing is completed.
---
16 matches
Mail list logo