Hi,
I have a problem with a Corosync/Pacemaker configuration.
One host of the cluster has been renamed and now the host is displayed
twice in the configuration.
When I try to remove the host from the configuration it works but if
corosync is restarted on one node, the old host appears again.
I tr
Taskatoshi/Rainer thanks so much for the quick responses and clarification.
In response to the rep_mode being set to sync.
If the master is running the monitor check as low as every 1s, then its
updating the nodes with the "new" master preference in the event that the
current synchronous replic
Hi Steven
2013/3/29 Steven Bambling :
>
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Rainer Brestan wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
> i think, you have misunderstood how ip addresses are used with this setup,
> PGVIP should start after promotion.
> Take a look at Takatoshi´s Wiki.
> https://github.com/t-matsuo/resource-a
Look at the order.
Master/replication VIP ist started after promote and stopped after demote.
listen_addresses = "*" means dont take care about specific interfaces, so it will listen on all interfaces not matter if they are coming up or switching down after postgres start.
The master either
Puh, i haven´t thought the discussion became this direction.
Corosync is not the only software, which need shared memory, so it is part of the OS startup to provide it, not part of Corosync or Pacemaker.
And yes, it is too late to mount it in Pacemaker startup.
Even in most embedded Linux ins
On Mar 28, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Rainer Brestan
mailto:rainer.bres...@gmx.net>> wrote:
Hi Steve,
i think, you have misunderstood how ip addresses are used with this setup,
PGVIP should start after promotion.
Take a look at Takatoshi´s Wiki.
https://github.com/t-matsuo/resource-agents/wiki/Resource-
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:37:37 +1100
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Rainer Brestan
> wrote:
> > Hi John,
> > to get Corosync/Pacemaker running during anaconda installation, i
> > have created a configuration RPM package which does a few actions
> > before starting Corosy
29.03.2013 03:31, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Benjamin Kiessling
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we've got a small pacemaker cluster running which controls an
>> active/passive router. On this cluster we've got a semi-large (~30)
>> number of primitives which are grouped togethe
