[Pacemaker] Nagios in pacemaker

hi all, i installed pacemaker 1.8.7 in two node & two resource. res_nagios_1lsb:nagiosres_httpd_1 lsb:httpd resource move is ok but problem is when resource moved to primary/secondary node the nagios check_ping give me high response time with critical status,which is runing nice

[Pacemaker] Monitor interval vs. timeout

I have a few questions about monitors. * Is the timeout counted from each monitor attempt individually, or from the oldest attempt, or from the newest? * Does it make more sense to set the interval shorter than the timeout, or longer? * Would setting timeout and interva

Re: [Pacemaker] resource modification and resource agent update

15.03.2013 18:38, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: [ ... ] >>> putting the resource in unmanaged mode, thought? >> >> No, monitors are still run in unmanaged mode. >> >> Global maintainance-mode="true" disables them. > > Right. Probably the simplest option. > >> Or just temporary delete 'op monitor' li

Re: [Pacemaker] problem on moving resource

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:46:48AM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:35:54PM -0300, Charles Mean wrote: > > Hey Guys, > > > > I am running heartbeat 3.0.5 and pacemaker 1.1.7 with two hosts(host01, > > host02). > > The thing is, when I try to define host01 as th

pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

Thanks for the explanation! Jamison Maxwell Sr. Systems Administrator HD Supply - Facilities Maintenance -Original Message- From: Lars Marowsky-Bree [mailto:l...@suse.com] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:35 AM To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Clus

Re: [Pacemaker] resource modification and resource agent update

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:16:52PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 15.03.2013 13:52, Leon Fauster wrote: > > Am 15.03.2013 um 10:49 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic : > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:48:16PM -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote: > >>> Hi!! Two quick questions. > >>> > >>> 1. I h

pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

On 2013-03-15T10:05:30, "Maxwell, Jamison [HDS]" wrote: > Is the HA community abandoning crmsh and why? The HA community is NOT abandoning crmsh. crmsh remains supported by the community, *and* on SLE HA. We are and will continue to develop it. RHT has made a decision not to support it on RHEL,

pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe crm_mon and the other crm_* commands are provided by pacemaker-cli, not by crmsh. (At least in the RHEL repos.) The reason I wanted crmsh back so badly was because I had entered and documented several aliases to make managing the cluster more convenient

Re: [Pacemaker] resource modification and resource agent update

15.03.2013 13:52, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 15.03.2013 um 10:49 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic : >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:48:16PM -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote: >>> Hi!! Two quick questions. >>> >>> 1. I have a resource that many other resources depend on. I need to >>> modify this "base

Re: [Pacemaker] resource modification and resource agent update

Am 15.03.2013 um 10:49 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic : > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:48:16PM -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote: >> Hi!! Two quick questions. >> >> 1. I have a resource that many other resources depend on. I need to >> modify this "base" resource, but if I modify this resource whi

Re: [Pacemaker] resource modification and resource agent update

Hi, On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:48:16PM -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote: > Hi!! Two quick questions. > > 1. I have a resource that many other resources depend on. I need to > modify this "base" resource, but if I modify this resource while it is > online, will pacemaker restart it to effect the ch

Re: [Pacemaker] problem on moving resource

Hi, On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:35:54PM -0300, Charles Mean wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I am running heartbeat 3.0.5 and pacemaker 1.1.7 with two hosts(host01, > host02). > The thing is, when I try to define host01 as the preferred by the following > command: > crm configure location prefer-host01 Ngin

pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

Hi, On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 03:03:21PM -0400, Maxwell, Jamison [HDS] wrote: > I was actually able to get the crm shell back onto a system > that I had upgraded unawares of the removal of the tool. How > bad an idea is that? I downloaded RPMs for crmsh-1.2.5-55 and > pssh-1.4.3 and installed them

Re: [Pacemaker] mysql/drbd on wheezy active/passive setup issues

Hi, On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:21:04PM -0400, christopher barry wrote: > Hi, > > I get this when I run ocf-tester: > > ocf-tester -n p_mysql /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/mysql > Beginning tests for /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/mysql... > /usr/sbin/ocf-tester: 214: /usr/sbin/ocf-tester:

Re: [Pacemaker] crm resource cleanup / reprobe

Hi, On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:55:52PM +, Hinds, Luke (NSN - GB/Farnborough) wrote: > Hi, > > What are the key differences between 'crm resource cleanup' and 'crm resource > reprobe'? The first removes all status records of the resource. One consequence is that CRM orders a probe on all no

pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

Andrew Beekhof writes: > I believe this should make everyone happy: >https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/3c9275e > > Are you able to test it? > I cloned the repo and used the pacemaker.spec.in file. I did have to tweak the spec file a bit to get it to build: %global specversion 8 #

pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

Maxwell, Jamison [HDS] writes: > Pssh complained about wanting python-2.5, but I wasn't going to downgrade > from 2.6, so I skipped the > dependency. I've tested several areas within the shell and all appears > well... crmsh (with pssh) from the SUSE ha repo works just fine, the only issue