Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker cluster with different operating systems

2013-03-06 Thread Osman Findik
Hi Andrew, Yes, I added "pcmk" file under "/etc/corosync/service.d/" folder. Since you think the setup should work, here are the details of the problem. Could you please check for any problem? I hope I have given enough information about the setup and problem. [root@pmidea1 ~]# more /etc/redhat-r

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About "sequential" designation of resource_set.

2013-03-06 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, > > You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group. > > If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with > > sequential=true). In "colocation", I used "resource_set". However, a result did not include the change. Will this result be a mistake of my setting? Case 1) se

Re: [Pacemaker] [RFC] Automatic nodelist synchronization between corosync and pacemaker

2013-03-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
07.03.2013 03:37, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 06.03.2013 08:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >>> So basically, you want to be able to add/remove nodes from nodelist.* >>> in corosync.conf and have pacemaker automatically add/remove them from

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About "sequential" designation of resource_set.

2013-03-06 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Thank you for comment. It was colocation. I make modifications and confirm movement. Many Thanks! Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Thu, 2013/3/7, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Oh! > > You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group. > If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About "sequential" designation of resource_set.

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Oh! You use the resource sets _instead_ of a group. If you want group.ordered=false, then use a colocation set (with sequential=true). If you want group.colocated=false, then use an ordering set (with sequential=true). Hope that helps :) On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:16 PM, wrote: > Hi Andrew,

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker cluster with different operating systems

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Osman Findik wrote: > Hi all, > We are using pacemaker with RHEL 6.2 successfully to manage pair of MySQL > databases. Pacemaker is coming from Red Hat High Availability Add-on. Its > version is 1.1.6 > Our need is to add an observer to this cluster but our existi

[Pacemaker] Pacemaker cluster with different operating systems

2013-03-06 Thread Osman Findik
Hi all, We are using pacemaker with RHEL 6.2 successfully to manage pair of MySQL databases. Pacemaker is coming from Red Hat High Availability Add-on. Its version is 1.1.6 Our need is to add an observer to this cluster but our existing servers are all RHEL 5.x servers. We could not locate same

Re: [Pacemaker] [Question]About "sequential" designation of resource_set.

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:27 PM, wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I tried "resource_set sequential" designation. > * http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/84578 > > I caused an error in start of the vip-master resource and confirmed movement. > > (snip) > > type="Du

[Pacemaker] [Question]About "sequential" designation of resource_set.

2013-03-06 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, I tried "resource_set sequential" designation. * http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/84578 I caused an error in start of the vip-master resource and confirmed movement. (snip)

Re: [Pacemaker] The correction request of the log of booth

2013-03-06 Thread yusuke iida
Hi, Jiaju 2013/3/6 Jiaju Zhang : > On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 15:13 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: >> Hi, Jiaju >> >> There is a request about the log of booth. >> >> I want you to change a log level when a ticket expires into "info" from >> "debug". >> >> I think that this log is important since it means

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem][crmsh]The designation of the 'ordered' attribute becomes the error.

2013-03-06 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Dejan, The problem was settled with your patch. However, I have a question. I want to use "resource_set" which Mr. Andrew proposed, but do not understand a method to use with crm shell. I read two next cib.xml and confirmed it with crm shell. Case 1) sequential="false". (snip)

Re: [Pacemaker] [RFC] Automatic nodelist synchronization between corosync and pacemaker

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.03.2013 08:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> So basically, you want to be able to add/remove nodes from nodelist.* >> in corosync.conf and have pacemaker automatically add/remove them from >> itself? > > Not corosync.conf, but cmap which i

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker resource migration behaviour

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:02 PM, James Guthrie wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Thanks for looking into this. We have since decided not to perform a >> failover on the failure of one of the sub-* resources for operational >> reasons. As a result

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker resource migration behaviour

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:02 PM, James Guthrie wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for looking into this. We have since decided not to perform a failover > on the failure of one of the sub-* resources for operational reasons. As a > result, I can't reliably test if this issue is actually fixed in the

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker resource migration behaviour

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:59 PM, James Guthrie wrote: > On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:41 PM, James Guthrie wrote: >>> Hi David, >>> >>> Unfortunately crm_report doesn't work correctly on my hosts as we have >>> compiled from source with custom p

Re: [Pacemaker] Block stonith when drbd inconsistent

2013-03-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
If you put drbd into maintenance mode, we'd not perform any state changes (stop/stop/promote/demote) on it that could fail. That would likely do what you're after. On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Jan Škoda wrote: > Dne 6.3.2013 06:38, Andrew Beekhof napsal(a): >> Nodes shouldn't be being fenced s

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem][crmsh]The designation of the 'ordered' attribute becomes the error.

2013-03-06 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Dejan, Hi Andrew, Thank you for comment. I confirm the movement of the patch and report it. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Wed, 2013/3/6, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 10:37:44AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Dejan, > > Hi Andr

[Pacemaker] Does LVM resouce agent conflict with UDEV rules?

2013-03-06 Thread Sven Arnold
Dear all, on my test setup (iSCSI on top of LVM on top of DRBD) I was not able to reliable migrate the volume group from one node to the other. I have two logical volumes that are mapped to two different LUNs on one iSCSI Target. During migration of the resource group (LVM + iSCSI) the LVM r

Re: [Pacemaker] Block stonith when drbd inconsistent

2013-03-06 Thread Jan Škoda
Dne 6.3.2013 06:38, Andrew Beekhof napsal(a): > Nodes shouldn't be being fenced so often. Do you know what is causing > this to happen? I know that this shouldn't happen frequently, but not having access to uptodate data is certainly unwanted and there should be a way to prevent it. DRBD is quite

Re: [Pacemaker] [RFC] Automatic nodelist synchronization between corosync and pacemaker

2013-03-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
06.03.2013 08:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 28.02.2013 07:21, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: 26.02.2013 11:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 6:18 PM,

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker DRBD as Physical Volume on Encrypted RAID1

2013-03-06 Thread senrabdet
Thanks Lars - will digest your response a bit, get back - appreciate the help! -Original Message- From: Lars Ellenberg To: pacemaker Sent: Wed, Mar 6, 2013 5:40 am Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker DRBD as Physical Volume on Encrypted RAID1 On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:27:24PM -

Re: [Pacemaker] The correction request of the log of booth

2013-03-06 Thread Jiaju Zhang
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 15:13 +0900, yusuke iida wrote: > Hi, Jiaju > > There is a request about the log of booth. > > I want you to change a log level when a ticket expires into "info" from > "debug". > > I think that this log is important since it means what occurred. > > And I want you to add

Re: [Pacemaker] standby attribute and same resources running at the same time

2013-03-06 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 06.03.2013 um 05:14 schrieb Andrew Beekhof : > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Leon Fauster > wrote: >> >> So far all good. I am doing some stress test now and noticed that rebooting >> one node (n2), that node (n2) will be marked as standby in the cib (shown on >> the >> other node (n1)). >

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem][crmsh]The designation of the 'ordered' attribute becomes the error.

2013-03-06 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Hideo-san, On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 10:37:44AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Dejan, > Hi Andrew, > > As for the crm shell, the check of the meta attribute was revised with the > next patch. > > * http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/crmsh/rev/d1174f42f4b3 > > This patch was back

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker DRBD as Physical Volume on Encrypted RAID1

2013-03-06 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:27:24PM -0500, senrab...@aol.com wrote: > Hi All: > > We're new to pacemaker (just got some great help from this forum > getting it working with LVM as backing device), and would like to > explore the Physical Volume option. We're trying configure on top of > an existing

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker resource migration behaviour

2013-03-06 Thread James Guthrie
Hi Andrew, Thanks for looking into this. We have since decided not to perform a failover on the failure of one of the sub-* resources for operational reasons. As a result, I can't reliably test if this issue is actually fixed in the current HEAD. (Speaking of which, do you have a date set yet f

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker resource migration behaviour

2013-03-06 Thread James Guthrie
On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:34 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:41 PM, James Guthrie wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> Unfortunately crm_report doesn't work correctly on my hosts as we have >> compiled from source with custom paths and apparently the crm_report and >> associated tools a