Here you go...
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/85bbaea
Thanks!
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Florian Crouzat
wrote:
> Le 05/02/2013 02:36, Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
>
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Florian Crouzat
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 01/02/2013 03:48, Andrew Beekhof a écrit
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Kazunori INOUE
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Yes, please see attached pacemaker.conf. It controls only pacemakerd.
I've pushed up the basic one in
https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/4bd8ac3
Once you're happy with the pacemaker-corosync.conf version, let me
kno
On 2013-02-28 13:19, senrab...@aol.com wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> We are stuck trying to get pacemaker to work with DRBD, and having tried
> various alternatives can't get our "drbd1" to mount and get some errors.
>
> NOTE: we are trying to get pacemaker to work with an existing Encrypted
> RAID1 LVM
On 2013-02-28T23:21:00, "Lentes, Bernd"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> no matter which of the two i choose ?
The question is - choose for what? Depending on what you want to do,
there is no alternative.
Basically, the only use case for OCFS2's internal DLM is if you want to
use OCFS2 without Pacemaker/coro
Michael wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2013, 11:13:42 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
> Lars wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi Bernd,
> >
> >
> >
> > > in the german IT newspaper "Linux-Magazin" 2/13 was an
> >
> > article, which says that the future of DLM (Distributed Lock
> > Manager) is unclear.
> >
> > > I'd
Thanks Jake - that's very helpful. I'll apply the corrections you
suggest
and continue testing.
On 2013-02-28 14:24, Jake Smith wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Allen Pomeroy" To:
pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:49:40 PM Subject: [Pacemaker]
Reso
- Original Message -
> From: "Allen Pomeroy"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:49:40 PM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] Resource stickiness not working as expected?
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a two node cluster (corosync + pacemaker) on Fedora Core 17.
> Wo
Hi guys,
I have a two node cluster (corosync + pacemaker) on Fedora Core 17.
Works
well to move resources over to the secondary cluster node, but when an
"unmove" command is issued now the resources fail back to the primary
cluster node - seemingly ignoring the resource-stickiness settings.
Wh
On 2013-02-25T11:42:40, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Or we fix the corosync problem with forking from a multi-threaded
> > program. ;-)
> That was essentially my point, Steve and I have already tried - for
> quite a long time too.
> I know some people think I just like changing things for the fun o
On 2013-02-28T17:51:03, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> crmsh used to make modifications in chunks, which was a bit
> complex due to element dependencies, but it worked if I can
> recall correctly. Then it got replaced by a full CIB replace
> (everybody claimed that it was the right thing to do).
Tho
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:06:15PM +0100, hugo holzer wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I try to add a lsb resource to my running corosync config.
>
> crm configure
> crm(live)configure# primitive slapd lsb:slapd
> crm(live)configure# commit
> --norc: no such option: noprofile
> ERROR: creating tmp shadow
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:03:02AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-02-25T12:20:13, "Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
>
> > > Perhaps there's a way to improve this.
> >
> > Well, the CIB is shared resource. Shared resources need to be locked
> > against these sort of racy updates. Is there n
On 2013-02-28T11:13:42, "Lentes, Bernd"
wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> thanks for claryfying that. So i can use DLM without any concern ?
Yes. At least I'm not aware of any concerns to have.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Ime
Yes. Although, the linux-cluster mailing list might be more appropriate,
I think most of the people there are here, too.
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
__
- Original Message -
> From: "hugo holzer"
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:06:15 AM
> Subject: [Pacemaker] debian 6 crm commit problem
>
>
> Hi
>
> I try to add a lsb resource to my running corosync config.
>
> crm configure
> crm(live)configu
Hi
I try to add a lsb resource to my running corosync config.
crm configure
crm(live)configure# primitive slapd lsb:slapd
crm(live)configure# commit
--norc: no such option: noprofile
ERROR: creating tmp shadow __crmshell.32177 failed
I am using user root. I'am using zsh, but I tried also under
Hi All:
We are stuck trying to get pacemaker to work with DRBD, and having tried
various alternatives can't get our "drbd1" to mount and get some errors.
NOTE: we are trying to get pacemaker to work with an existing Encrypted RAID1
LVM setup - is this impossible or a "just plain bad idea"?
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2013, 11:13:42 schrieb Lentes, Bernd:
> Lars wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hi Bernd,
> >
> >
> >
> > > in the german IT newspaper "Linux-Magazin" 2/13 was an
> >
> > article, which says that the future of DLM (Distributed Lock
> > Manager) is unclear.
> >
> > > I'd like to crea
Lars wrote:
>
> Hi Bernd,
>
> > in the german IT newspaper "Linux-Magazin" 2/13 was an
> article, which says that the future of DLM (Distributed Lock
> Manager) is unclear.
> > I'd like to create a HA cluster with two nodes, accessing
> concurrently one FC SAN with OCFS2. I need DLM.
> > I wonder
On 2013-02-25T12:20:13, "Brian J. Murrell" wrote:
> > Perhaps there's a way to improve this.
>
> Well, the CIB is shared resource. Shared resources need to be locked
> against these sort of racy updates. Is there no locking of any kind at
> any level of CIB modifying operations?
No. There's n
On 02/28/2013 02:45 PM, zhuyj wrote:
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_fr
21 matches
Mail list logo
